Jump to content

PPA Transparency


Bat

Recommended Posts

During the past couple of months there were many arguments regarding transparency of the CSA and their unethical business practises. As many Huber's proudly and enthusiastically pointed out that the CSA are not concerned about the people they are supposed to represent "The Cyclists" but are more concerned about their personal trips to the forthcoming Olympics. Here on all the above mentioned issues and some other CSA issues I also agree with most of these Huber's.

 

However what I noticed during these months were how easy it is for specific individual Huber's always to push and promote the PPA as they are the transparent cycling body and organisation who should even hopefully take over the duties and functions of the CSA. I am not going into past discussions about the PPA and if they are there as an Events Company or are they there to represent the cyclist interest, or how much money they make or have.

 

I would like to point out that in my opinion the PPA and the CSA are all non transparent cycling organisations with their own personal "Brotherhood" membership as priority, before the cycle community interest are addressed at large. I received an anonymous letter regarding the latest PPA CEO election. This letter just illustrate and highlight the fact that our PPA and CSA are in actual fact no deferent in practice from each others transparency operations. Makes you think.

 

 

post-45832-0-62079400-1434627056_thumb.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Who do you represent that makes your "tip off" worth any consideration? Why send the letter to you?

 

 

Who do you represent that makes your "tip off" worth any consideration? Why send the letter to you?

I represent myself. Maybe the letter was send to me as I questioned a couple of Huber's who were always very outspoken about anything the CSA had to do or say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah, ok.. so based on previous PPA discussions.

Could be previous, it can be existing, the point is the transparency of PPA and the CSA are all the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the PPA and the CSA are all non transparent cycling organisations with their own personal "Brotherhood" membership as priority, before the cycle community interest are addressed at large

 

that's what ive always believed :thumbup:

 

never trust anyone who puts himself on a committee and claims to represent you :ph34r:

 

next they will want legislation to make us all to pay them money whether we choose to or not (and they'll tell us its in cyclists best interests) :whistling:

Edited by velomonatiCT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in time for Friday!!

 

On a more serious point of interest, can it be established whether or not the contents with regard to membership of various groups is correct firstly?

 

Only then can we discuss and consider the appointment if the facts are as stipulated.

 

There is another thread which highlights that the appointed CEO is a hubber, perhaps he can be asked to comment accordingly.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know the background, or how much truth there is in any of this, but, I can't help but wonder why the letter is unsigned and seems to be dropped in random postboxes? (at least that is how I understood it from the other thread mentioning this letter)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout