Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wow looks good. I want. But I think I'll still only keep it at the rear. Personally think it's still not aggressive enough for the front but would need to test it or read a few reviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly only 27.5, for now hopefully, I too only saw that after I made this post, my bad, it probably means the Crossmark II has been released recently. I did contact them with regards to 29ers. I will keep you posted!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi All

 

Does anyone have an opinion on the Crossmark 2 EXO 2.35 29er now that they have been available for a while?

I am looking to replace my tires and want something strong but also doing a bit of commuting so dont want tires that are too expensive for now. 

Was looking at the Crossmark 2 for front a rear. I would definitely not go with 2.1 on front, but not sure if 2.35 will give enough grip.

 

Currently have Schwable nobbly nic front and back that came standard with the bike, but they are not snakeskin and I have had too many issues with them as the sidewalls  leak and "soft" punctures that dont seal too well (partly due to lack of sealant maintenance to be fair) .

I love Schwable in general from a performance perspective in general but a bit expensive when adding some commuting into the mix.

I dont need as much grip as the nobbly nic front and back that I am currently running for my type of riding 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you ever drive through Paarl, let me know. I have a used set of 2.1 Crossmarks just taking up space that you can take off my hands. The one probably has about 500km left, but the other one still has 1000km+ tread left. You can use them at the back and just buy a 2.35 for the front. I switched to Maxxis skinwalls 2.2 ikon at the back and a 2.4 ardent at the front two months ago, and I won't be switching back!! Love the grip of that 2.4 up front on descents! When I commute I just run the pressures a bit higher. Done over 2000km on them now, the Ikon can probably go another 1500km, but the Ardent at least another 3000km.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the offer but not keen on the 2.1 

I was considering the Icon / Ardent combo, or Crossmark 2.3 / Ardent combo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the cross mark 2 on my anthem. Love it, just feels heavier somehow than the original, although I have no science to back that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crossmark II's are absolutely bullet proof IMHO. Have been running them on my hard tail training bike for a while now. Front and back 2.3 EXO. They are cheap as chips in the Maxxis range and work well tubeless. I see CL has a promo on but it looks like the old Crossmark and not the II'S so not sure of the difference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I miss JB. This would be the point where he moans about how a Swiss flag on a tyre tread is the biggest undercover conspiracy since Armstrong went for a stroll (I'm not talking about Lance)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw that, what's up with the pic? Is it a cut and paste job of someone else's tire caus I have not seen it on a Maxxis before. The little yellow emblem next to it is also used by Mavic on some of their tires. Not that Mavic make their own tires as far as I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all

I have pulled the trigger on Icon 2.35 for front and back. Will give feedback on grip when I get them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout