Jump to content

Restraint of trade


Piernas Flacas

Recommended Posts

In my line of business, restraint of trade clauses are quite common, especially where the business is sold to a new proprietor. (It is sometimes used for key professional employees as well, but not as often). The old owner is then often prohibited from starting or working in a similar business in the same area and for a fixed period. Both the area and the time must be reasonable and agreed beforehand as part of the sales contract. Often it is for and area within a 50km radius, sometimes specific municipal areas are named, depending on whether it is in the city or countryside. Often the period is for 2 or a maximum of 3 years. It is difficult and expensive to enforce, but it gets done and it is accepted by the courts. I did my homework recently because I wanted to employ a person who is bound by a restraint of trade agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In my line of business, restraint of trade clauses are quite common, especially where the business is sold to a new proprietor. (It is sometimes used for key professional employees as well, but not as often). The old owner is then often prohibited from starting or working in a similar business in the same area and for a fixed period. Both the area and the time must be reasonable and agreed beforehand as part of the sales contract. Often it is for and area within a 50km radius, sometimes specific municipal areas are named, depending on whether it is in the city or countryside. Often the period is for 2 or a maximum of 3 years. It is difficult and expensive to enforce, but it gets done and it is accepted by the courts. I did my homework recently because I wanted to employ a person who is bound by a restraint of trade agreement.

In yr example a RoT would certainly be enforceable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is her only means of earning an income it is going to be difficult to enforce.

 

I am a cabinetmaker by trade, thus, a restraint of trade would affect my ability to earn an income. Thus a ROT will not be enforceable. I do however have some insights into systems and methods that is fairly unique to my company, that is what non-disclosure is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a cabinetmaker by trade, thus, a restraint of trade would affect my ability to earn an income. Thus a ROT will not be enforceable. I do however have some insights into systems and methods that is fairly unique to my company, that is what non-disclosure is for.

The problem is that there is no effective means of policing non disclosures. Hence, why a restraint is necessary to protect the company’s proprietary interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that there is no effective means of policing non disclosures. Hence, why a restraint is necessary to protect the company’s proprietary interests.

 

It's a vicious circle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a previous company I worked for they asked me to sign a RoT document. I refused. They never bothered to push the issue or summoned me to the head of HR, which probably meant that they knew that their RoT was not enforceable. I feel that many times the RoT document is used to scare key staff from accepting jobs at customers or competitors. Very difficult to enforce if you are a developer with very specific field knowledge.

Edited by Moridin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

having been through retrenchment myself (temporary works and scaffolding industry), the ROT generally falls away if you are retrenched. my understanding is that ROT is mostly aimed to avoid people being lured away by competing companies.

 

however, if you are a director for instance, i have seen it being enforced very strictly.

 

ultimately you cannot expect someone to be unemployed because of a ROT agreement. good luck trying to enforce that.

 

take the agreement and seek legal council. that is the best possible advice.

 

good luck dude, its always a stressful situation to deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROT are more effective towards people in sales. Companies try to protect their client base and thus easier to enforce. The big issue to remember is the financial impact. If a company decide to use the ROT, the best way is to apply for an urgent court order in the high court, meaning you will have to appoint legal council to defend. This is expensive, especially if you lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I good friend of mine has had ROT enforced against him and is unable to work in the Motor trade Sales for one year.

It is a hell of an expensive way to move companies cost him 200k plus trying to fight it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that sucks balls, sorry to hear man!

 

how was it enforced?

 

 

I good friend of mine has had ROT enforced against him and is unable to work in the Motor trade Sales for one year.

It is a hell of an expensive way to move companies cost him 200k plus trying to fight it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that sucks balls, sorry to hear man!

 

how was it enforced?

The new company he moved to will not be allowed to let his sell until February 2020.

The court ruled in his old Companys Favour.

A bit of a BS thing as far as Im concerned 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new company he moved to will not be allowed to let his sell until February 2020.

The court ruled in his old Companys Favour.

A bit of a BS thing as far as Im concerned

I am *very* interested to see the judgment. Anyway you can ask your mate to email it to me? I will pm you my email addy.

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not cool. I always find it interesting how you can be legally constrained to make a living. Thats just my opinion based on no legal premise. So you have to stay where you are or face unemployment for a year. How does that work?

 

Anyways, sorry to hear. Its a tough situation to be in.

 

The new company he moved to will not be allowed to let his sell until February 2020.

The court ruled in his old Companys Favour.

A bit of a BS thing as far as Im concerned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she takes a voluntary retrenchment package, she must insist on a clause in the separation agreement releasing her from the restraint.

As always, there is a warm coffee with your name on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout