Jump to content

kingmilo

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kingmilo

  1. To be honest a lot of things weren't done correctly that I only found out after leaving the shop unfortunately. I wish I had known of this community before I went buying. My first port of call tomorrow is to purchase a shock pump and will definitely check it regularly and if there is a problem I'll be sure to take it in - thanks!
  2. As far as I know it would be fine even up to my height 187cm although as pointed out I should probably be on an XL frame, but I have short legs (inside leg measures about 84/85cm), and a long torso which makes a difference. Then it comes down to the specific bike and how you feel on it I guess. Some basic info here: http://grouptrails.com/fitness/whats-my-bike-size/ The other gents will know better though so interested to see what they have to say.
  3. The problem is that isint even a joke I already have a road bike and investigating tri-bike, where does it stop!!! Single speed would be nice to get around the city hmm...
  4. Ha ha! Yes definitely so but I am still going to try out an XL frame hard-tail 29er to see how it fairs compared to the dual-sus. The way I see this going is I will have both and be even poorer than we I started, there is no 'cheap' when it comes to bicycling I am learning fast!
  5. Ok so I checked the rear shock, 20 PSI, explains a lot! Pumped it up to 190 PSI, took it for a spin through Tokai forest, jeep and single track and riding was much better!! Bikes still feels heavy but not as heavy ha ha, maybe I just have legs for ants! Thanks everyone for their input especially Hairy & V12man! milo
  6. Thanks, just made that change! Now all I need is a shock pump to test PSI and take it for a ride
  7. Thanks for the info Hairy! I've downloaded the manual and done some tests as outlined. I think as pointed out above adjusting the BB height will help a bit with clearance. I have also adjusted the rebound setting by 2 clicks clockwise to assist with rebound and will test. The last test as you pasted above has very bad results (considering that I am doing it correctly!) Firstly I ensure that the suspension lever is on full-mode (full suspension as I understand it), then I move the o-ring up to make contact with the shock piston, I then sit on the bike with my feet on the pedals, then move to a position where I am standing over the bike, ie. only contact I have is holding the handlebars and get the spacing between the piston and the o-ring measured. according to the Scott site it should be between 7-8mm at my current weight (103kg's this morning). The distance however is more like 10cm, when I get on the bike the piston drops almost flush with the bottom of the rod it moves on, moving the o-ring to that position, so when I get off the space between the piston and the o-ring is almost at it's maximum I would say which is around 10cm, if not more. Is it then clear that the shock pressure is obviously not what it should be (191 PSI again according to Scott based on my weight and ride experience), it seems drastically off and could be the whole reason I am struggling to get around?? Thanks again to all you guys for your insight, I am learning fast here, much appreciated. milo
  8. I'm guessing you mean the BB height? https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/technology/bike/Adjustable_BB_Height/
  9. Thanks, you guys have been very helpful, learnt a lot already! Hairy ill dm you soon shot!
  10. Yup, live and work in town and that would be great thanks! But let me bring the bike to you seeing as though you doing me a favour
  11. I agree after all the feedback that it's not the small weight gain but most probably the setup, hopefully the L size frame isin't a fail. I will try locking out my rear shock and going over my setup again, thanks for your input.
  12. According to ergo fit yes and all my other bikes are XL, but when purchasing the Scott the owner of the reputable bicycling shop said the L of this particular bike would be fine also after looking at my ergo fit details, I went on his advice, maybe wrongfully so now I see but none wiser at the time I guess, you know how these things go. Maybe I should rent a HT 29er and take it for a ride around the mountain and see how it compares.
  13. I gave the guy at the shop my ergo fit details and he adjusted the bike accordingly with me making some adjustments as I went along but I agree the suspension setup doesn't feel right even though there were adjustments made to the suspension according to my weight, something I will need to look at again. As Mongoose also pointed out below perhaps I should be on an XL but I went on the 'expert' advice of the guys at the shop after giving them my ergo info.
  14. Hairy, a Scott Spark 940 2013 (L frame) about 2 months old.
  15. Thanks, I think the general consensus here is that HT would probably be better for my situation. Now to go through a different learning curve, trying to sell the bike
  16. 9.8kg's is very light, the HT's I have been looking at are around 11/12kg's. Unlike yourself I am not 'racing' downhills so going as fast as possible is not necessary, the faster/easier I can go uphill the better in my situation so I think HT might be the way to go, thanks for the info!
  17. I think I could survive the bumpy ride downhill I'm pretty much used to it already, climbing is more important to me because it's the most difficult part of my ride at my weight! Didn't think of just changing the frame, thanks for the suggestion
  18. Hi Hubbers! I have gotten into cycling, specifically mountain biking, over the past year. At the moment I have two bikes, a 26er hard-tail and a 29er dual-suspension. I have also spent a lot of time on a hard-tail 29er which is a friend of mines. As per the title I weigh +-100kg's, 6ft2, with not much body fat. I live in Cape Town and do most of my riding on Table Mountain with the dual-sus 29er. When I am in other provinces I use the 26er and hard-tail 29er respectively. What I notice is that my worst rides from a struggling with getting up hills point of view and just getting around in general are on the dual-sus 29er. I don't know if it is just because it is much heavier than the hard-tails or if it is just not setup correctly (although I was fitted on the bike), but I really don't enjoy my riding when I ride with the dual-sus 29er. To give you an example, while in Durban I had the pleasure of riding at Holla Trails, the yellow route (48km's) on a hard-tail 29er and it was an absolute pleasure. Back home in the Cape I often cycle to the blockhouse on Table Mountain +-20km, and I also took part in the Xterra in Grabouw which was a difficult 28km's but it felt like murder on the dual-sus 29er, and the blockhouse ride sucks until I start the descent. At the moment the thoughts going through my head are sell the dual-suspension and move to a hard-tail. Carrying 100kg's around is already difficult as it is, am I being foolish trying to do it on a heavier dual-suspension bike? The type of riding I do is recreational, table mountain, the odd off-road triathlon and I am hoping to do some stage races next year like sani2c. Having said that could it be that I need more experience on the dual-suspension, my legs need to get stronger, the setup needs to be looked at? All of which I am going to do regardless before making a decision. I find that it feels like I am riding quite low even with the suspension locked out and my pedals often make contact with objects, which when on a hard-tail, would normally not happen unless the pedals are vertical when going over an obstacle. I climb hills like a demon on a hard-tail and like a rookie on the dual-sus. I would just like some insight from experienced riders like yourself, perhaps this is a normal learning curve. The 29er is a Scott Spark 940. Thanks! milo
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout