Napalm Posted May 9, 2008 Posted May 9, 2008 Here are the main points:Website design and maintenance (CGC' date=' CSA etc)[/quote'] I can't comment on the CGC site, but the CSA site is maintained well, and although not visually exciting as it could be it's a stands out by comparison with the rest of cycling sites in SA. The overall quality of cycling website design is not bad - it's sh*t.
Rocket Man Posted May 9, 2008 Author Posted May 9, 2008 Whilst some of these things are the responsibility of other organisations or just nice-to-have's, the riders want them sorted out so that they can have an exciting race that runs smoothly right from first idea to bragging to your friends that you're on TV. As an organiser you can't blame someone else when things go wrong. The rider has paid the money and wants good service!
bob_the_builder Posted May 9, 2008 Posted May 9, 2008 As an organiser you can't blame someone else when things go wrong. The rider has paid the money and wants good service! Hence my road fixing comment...
Rocket Man Posted May 9, 2008 Author Posted May 9, 2008 As an organiser you can't blame someone else when things go wrong. The rider has paid the money and wants good service!Hence my road fixing comment... 100% agreement. That's what I'm looking for here - how far can organisers go to ensure a FUNTASTIC event? No holds barred, no limits, no excuses...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now