Jump to content

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Members
  • Posts

    31171
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

  1. I will do that as soon as we have agreement on the process. Discussing it with the parties concerned and may have reached a conclusion, but do not want to post before final confirmation is given
  2. Dude. Yeah. Totally. And tbh I think you made the right choice on the cabbie. The 3.0, while being a monster, is also ass-rapingly expensive comparatively. And let's face it - you're not going to be towing Jabba the Hut anytime soon, are you?
  3. When are you doing the same for your ranger? Or maybe contact those guys that custom make those tailgate covers and get them to print it on that for you so you don't have to sticker the new cab...
  4. Technically, the turn could remain... Cos you are going to France, and the Frenchies do generally pooh-pooh any outsiders? Rat - capital M with a halo on top of it? Pint would look better in black though.
  5. Busy discussing the best way for the elections to be done with Kandui (Rob Vogel) Vince, Duane & Deon. 2 options, one of which should be finalized and accepted by tomorrow, hopefully.
  6. I've just emailed Meurant, and will post the results and rules here. Someone who is still a member of the Tokai DH Riders group will need to post them on my behalf seeing as I cannot any more.
  7. All important notes, Kandui. And no, the voting process has NOT been laid out fully. Candidates, as Thor has pointed out, should state their case for representing Tokai, in whatever way they can - the vast majority of riders in Tokai and surrounding areas has no idea who Vince or I are, or that Dan Dobinson is on the existing committee. That needs to be ironed out before the voting can commence.
  8. Yeah. That could be a problem. Guys, I want this to be totally sold by the time the AGM comes, so that there's no confusion. Continue to send your nominations through, but as for the actual process of voting, we need to clarify that.
  9. Okay - so essentially only the nominations count. Whoever has the most amount of nominations gets voted in, if they agree to it. Positions are then discussed within the newly elected committee. Correct? So you ONLY have to send your nominations, without listing portfolios, in to AMARider. Anyone averse to this?
  10. Yeah Rika, I agree with you here. Let's keep it to the guys in and around the centre itself, who actually use the park and are directly affected by the AGM. That can include people that come from all over, but it also means that Mr. Joe Average from Hermanus doesn't come through 'cos he once saw tokai in 1995 and now sees this. But - at the same time the proxy process must be controlled to a degree. That must be the last resort. And the forms MUST be signed by the granters of the proxy. 'cos the process, as open as it is, may be open to abuse from any person involved.
  11. Hey Patch, imo Duane etc shouldn't get flak at all. Its something that EVErYONE should do. Regardless of rider type. Any naysayers can only be ascribed to jealousy. Yes, I said it. There.
  12. I'm placing that in the proxy form, but you're right. That needs to be amended. EDIT: It has been. Nominations for the following posts: XC Rep DH Rep Sec/Treas PR / liaison Fundraising
  13. Especially if she hands out riding tips. I know I could use a few... And she damn near whips me into oblivion.
  14. Given the tone of this thread, why did you not try to come back when the invitation was always open?
  15. Just been confirmed - I have been removed from the group for so called "derogatory remarks"
  16. Ah. Then that would be me. LOLz. No derogatory remarks were posted, I can guarantee you that.
  17. Ding ding. That is the crux of the argument, and the core of it all. Why indeed. The structures were always there. The invitation was always there.
  18. Dude, your industry is worse than most, if not all. But I think we've found an equivalent.
  19. There is now no longer a Tokai DH Riders page. Not even as a closed group. Unless it's been unpublished and is being "cleaned" - there was a LOT of vitriol and "incriminating content" relating to the trails and disregard for the authority of Parks. So I can only imagine that when Pappa Bear posted that screenshot (and subsequently sent me a copy of the entire thread) the owner of the page went into Damage Control.
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout