cyclists are not mentioned specifically in the new plans for the gardens, but it will affect us. See the master plan diagramme and more about the City Parks rationale on: http://www.jhbcityparks.com/latest/new-plan-for-botanical-gardens.html then it seems we have an ally in EDGE, which is the dog walkers' pressure group! (sorry, it's a bit long and quite adversararial, but we may want to sign their petition. VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> Dear EDGE members and concerned Emmarentia Park Users You will all have been aware of the court action and the interim interdict that was obtained by EDGE and ERA/Eliott on 15 December 2007 to prevent Johannesburg City Parks ("JCP") putting up a fence through Emmarentia. The fence which was in the process of being constructed before the interdict was obtained would have divided Emmarentia park in two and confined many park users to a small area to the South of the proposed fence. About 6 weeks ago JCP conceded both EDGE and ERA/Eliott's High Court applications by withdrawing its decision to erect the fence. They tendered to pay the costs of the court applications. The victory was short lived. No sooner had the decision between "withdrawn", JCP then published a new notice saying that it intends to implement certain "proposed changes" including the erection of the fence. I attach a copy of this notice in PDF format. You will note from the map that they intend to erect the fence in precisely the same place as last year. They have taken these steps because they realized that their decision was flawed at least on the following bases; procedurally because they did not consult with affected parties and substantively because they discovered after we had launched our court applications that there was an existing Johannesburg City Council resolution that had resolved that a fence should not be put up through Emmarentia. JCP has since had this resolution rescinded by the Johannesburg City Council, thus paving the way for it to achieve its ultimate objective which is to put up the "palisade fence" precisely as decided and in the same place designated last year. They are also attempting to pre-empt any criticism that they have not consulted with the community or followed due process. JCP has demonstrated a very disturbing lack of bona fides in the manner in which it acted last year. I strongly believe that JCP will pay lip service to proper and full consultation and that whatever the views of the community are, they will find justification for erecting the fence. While they say they are going to seek the views of the community and interest parties, the fence is a foregone conclusion and they will do whatever is necessary to give effect to their plans. EDGE will be calling upon its members to provide support for a potential further court challenge to stop JCP in its ongoing efforts to desecrate our treasured park. This support could involve amongst other things: assisting to update a petition against the erection of the fence (there are already about 3000 signatures) putting up notices liaison/communications (there are a number of affected organizations such as the boating club, the cycling club, running clubs) financial assistance gathering statements to be used in the court application lobbying political representatives obtaining of information and providing resources which will assist in the pursuance of further legal proceedings If you are in position to assist in any of the above, please would you contact me telephonically or by e-mail. A public meeting has been proposed for 26 November 2008 at 19h00 to be held at <?: prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Marks Park in the Pavillion room to discuss our opposition. We will send you further details in due course. The attached notice from JCP calls for "written comments" to be forwarded to Johannesburg City Parks care of Sim & Botsi Attorneys (being the attorneys who represented them in the High Court application). EDGE intends to make a detailed submission and we invite you to consider the issues fully and send us your comments, which we may want to incorporate into EDGE's submission. A copy of the previous court application (which is not yet resolved) can be downloaded by clicking here http://www.dogwalkers.co.za/docs/EDGEvJCP.pdf (the file is 3.24 megabytes) Many of the arguments against putting up the fence are articulated in the founding papers of the court application and we urge members and persons who are opposed to the fence to download the documents and read them. They highlight the issues and may assist in clarifying the arguments in relation to our opposition to the erection of a fence. Please also visit EDGE's website at www.dogwalkers.co.za Regards Steven Kuny Chairperson of EDGE wildog_a2008-11-13 05:31:05