Verbruggen makes a tit of himself, why leave it all to Fat Pat?

[petatodd]

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/verbruggen-wont-take-legal-action-against-hamilton

 

Dutchman reacts angrily to questions on Armstrong testing

 

 

When asked about the USADA case Verbruggen reacted angrily, saying, "I don't talk about that. You're a journalist. You hear that those people say Armstrong has arranged with the UCI... If you would be a guy that thinks like Landis or Hamilton wouldn't you ask Armstrong what are you doing with the tests that are done by USADA? What are going to do with the tests by WADA, AFLD? Nobody says that. What I mean is, if Armstrong tells those riders I can arrange with the UCI, if you were Hamilton wouldn't you say, 'Lance what if I'm controlled by USADA, what are you going to do if I'm found positive?' He has been controlled 500 times, maybe 200 times other than us."

 

The claim of 500 tests has never been officially proven but current UCI President Pat McQuaid recently publicised that Armstrong had been tested 215 times by the UCI. However when Cyclingnews pointed out that they weren't aware of how many times Armstrong had been tested or which body had tested him each time, Verbruggen added:

"You should. God dammit. You're here with your microphone embarrassing me with all types of questions. I'm mad at people like you. You don't even do your homework. Is he only controlled by the UCI, he's controlled by other bodies. Am I entitled to be upset? You can write that. I wonder. You don't know the rules. That's upsetting for me. I'm 72 and I don't need lessons from people like that. You don't do your bloody homework. I know he's been tested. Yes. You should bloody well know; I hope to see that you write that. 'We as journalists don't do our homework'."

[Tumbleweed]

I see the Kimmage fund is getting quite a bit of support. It's a disgrace that they are suing him.

 

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kimmage-humbled-by-defense-fund-support

Edited September 25, 2012 by Tumbleweed

[goya-goya]

nah...

 

Fair Game!..

 

Verbruggen is 100% correct... I even read another article where he quotes that Armstrong never, never, never doped... and that was in the same article where he said he and Pat were suing Kimmage... for only 6000 euros??? that begs the question??? why would a man with so much means only sue for such a little? There is something else going on here that I have not yet figured out...

 

And Still the ICI have no documents...

 

And did you guys notice there is going to be a bill to protect athletes in the witch hunt endeavors of the ungoverned body USADA... which will now become accountable... yipee! haha

 

Also races and events that are sanctioned by bodies goverened by USADA and WADA are starting to de-affilliate their events... just to let Armstrong enter!!!

 

its not over yet.

 

GO Lance GO!!! :clap:

[goya-goya]

http://www.cyclingne...gainst-hamilton

 

Dutchman reacts angrily to questions on Armstrong testing

 

 

When asked about the USADA case Verbruggen reacted angrily, saying, "I don't talk about that. You're a journalist. You hear that those people say Armstrong has arranged with the UCI... If you would be a guy that thinks like Landis or Hamilton wouldn't you ask Armstrong what are you doing with the tests that are done by USADA? What are going to do with the tests by WADA, AFLD? Nobody says that. What I mean is, if Armstrong tells those riders I can arrange with the UCI, if you were Hamilton wouldn't you say, 'Lance what if I'm controlled by USADA, what are you going to do if I'm found positive?' He has been controlled 500 times, maybe 200 times other than us."

 

The claim of 500 tests has never been officially proven but current UCI President Pat McQuaid recently publicised that Armstrong had been tested 215 times by the UCI. However when Cyclingnews pointed out that they weren't aware of how many times Armstrong had been tested or which body had tested him each time, Verbruggen added:

"You should. God dammit. You're here with your microphone embarrassing me with all types of questions. I'm mad at people like you. You don't even do your homework. Is he only controlled by the UCI, he's controlled by other bodies. Am I entitled to be upset? You can write that. I wonder. You don't know the rules. That's upsetting for me. I'm 72 and I don't need lessons from people like that. You don't do your bloody homework. I know he's been tested. Yes. You should bloody well know; I hope to see that you write that. 'We as journalists don't do our homework'."

 

Do you actually know what position verbruggen has within the UCI? tut...tut

[Tumbleweed]

Bwahahahahahahahaha! Someone actually is taking Sensenbrenner seriously!

[Tumbleweed]

The small-boned one puts it eloquently:

This bill is not designed to improve the due process rights of athletes, which are already adequately protected by current rules that were recently approved by a federal court. This bill is designed to improve the public image of one spoiled and disgraced athlete with substantial political power at the profound detriment of thousands of professional athletes with none.

 

http://150wattsofawesome.blogspot.com/2012/09/dear-congress-in-re-sensenbrenner-and.html#comment-form

[goya-goya]

Bwahahahahahahahaha! Someone actually is taking Sensenbrenner seriously!

 

By the number of posts you make... I wonder what you do for a living?

 

And dude that 150kg chick you keep bringing up is gonna be fodder in a few months! haha

[Tumbleweed]

What I do for a living is neither your business nor does it have any relevance to this topic.

[goya-goya]

baited and hooked! thanx for that little doggie

[Tumbleweed]

Troll.

[goya-goya]

Not a troll... just proving my point... that you lack discernment as to what is relevant and not...

[Tumbleweed]

Funny that, even with a lack of discerment, I do know that most of your posts aren't relevant.

[E1A104]

nah...

 

Fair Game!..

 

Verbruggen is 100% correct... I even read another article where he quotes that Armstrong never, never, never doped... and that was in the same article where he said he and Pat were suing Kimmage... for only 6000 euros??? that begs the question??? why would a man with so much means only sue for such a little? There is something else going on here that I have not yet figured out...

 

And Still the ICI have no documents...

 

And did you guys notice there is going to be a bill to protect athletes in the witch hunt endeavors of the ungoverned body USADA... which will now become accountable... yipee! haha

 

Also races and events that are sanctioned by bodies goverened by USADA and WADA are starting to de-affilliate their events... just to let Armstrong enter!!!

 

its not over yet.

 

GO Lance GO!!! :clap:

 

Hope the bill also protects team Managers and doctors etc that are also being persecuted by USADA.

 

EDIT: Spelling mistake

Edited September 25, 2012 by E1A104

[Tumbleweed]

Jeremy Whittle ‏@jeremycwhittle

Current French sports minister: "I will be very careful to ensure that there is no political intervention in the fight against doping."

[Tumbleweed]

Don't know how defamation works in Europe, but wouldn't it be funny if the Swiss court was found to be lack jurisdiction over remarks in Brit and French papers?

[Tumbleweed]

Keep the politicians out of sport:

 

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/french-sports-minister-calls-for-uci-to-uphold-armstrong-sanction

 

"In October 2009, Armstrong was invited to lunch at the Elysée," Rieu recalled. "It was known that he wanted to obtain the departure of the AFLD president, Pierre Bordry, who resigned one year later. In March 2010, Armstrong presented Sarkozy with a bike. And a few months later, Sarkozy praised Lance Armstrong as a role model during a stage of the Tour de France. It was abusive."