Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As far as i know NW chainrings arent new technology and the origional inventor never patent the deisgn.So SRAM can only patent their X-glide ans X-sync style of NW components,and are realising this by branching out their technology with chromag etc..

 

Should mean a start to more choice and cheaper prices :thumbup:

Posted (edited)

As far as i know NW chainrings arent new technology and the origional inventor never patent the deisgn.So SRAM can only patent their X-glide ans X-sync style of NW components,and are realising this by branching out their technology with chromag etc..

 

Should mean a start to more choice and cheaper prices :thumbup:

 

Ok i got 1/2 of what i remembered right ......... expired 70's patent ..

 

On a side note, we asked Race Face why everyone has been able to produce narrow/wide rings without infringing on any patented designs from SRAM. The surprising answer, is that the concept of narrow-wide chainring goes back to an expired patent from the 1970′s. Race Face, and we’re assuming everyone else other than SRAM, has designed the tooth profiling within the scope of that expired patent, to avoid any patent infringement and create a ring with excellent chain retention properties. Sram will likely be able to patent some of the aspects of XX1, though companies like Race Face have been very careful to design their own versions of this what’s-old-is-new-again technology.

Edited by 2Nutz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout