Thule roof bike carrier (ProRide591)

[GoLefty!!]

actually i did mail them and they confirmed that they are talking about Boot carriers, not tow bar fitted carriers.

 

Also I posted a link tothe findings of research conducted at Cambridge University, not some automobile enthusiats club, which bears out everyones gut feel that roof mounted bikes results in higher fuel consumption.

 

you reported the findings of what you read incorrectly. Or you just read the article and misunderstood the findings.

 

Surely you can take responsibility for that??!

 

OR is that the german's fault too...?

[TheLegend]

haha, you are a poor soul! you just need to be right and put others oficially as loosers. incredible.

 

1) if you really wrote them and that was the answer good you cleared that up

 

2) if you read my posts attentively i always wrote "carriers behind the

car" never boot or towbar. if you are so pendandtic you have to be more

attentive yourself.

 

3) "you reported the findings of what you read incorrectly. Or you just

read the article and misunderstood the findings." again if you were

really in contact with them it must be one of those.

 

how big is the difference between tow abr and boot carriers? please

post what they wrote to you so we all can be educated by you!

 

4) why you writing "the germans fault too...?"?? i never blamed them fr

anything? who did? you obviously just wrote that to put more weight to

your post. that's....well....

 

but it might be the fault of a german since i am a german....hmmmm

 

5) was i completely wrong? there's two systems of carriers behind the car and the one shows the results i have written. most people surely don't think there's a difference!

 

you apparently put some effort in supporting your point and were succesfull. well done. the way you did it was pretty arrogant but i guess that's how you are.

and now?

what a kick!!