bruce Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Voting 'No' on this, because I believe (for reasoan well documented) that this is a misguided attempt at improving the situation between cyclists and other road users. This promotes segregated cycling which is, in my mind, more dangerous than integrated cycling.
Guest Big H Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Voting 'No' on this' date=' because I believe (for reasoan well documented) that this is a misguided attempt at improving the situation between cyclists and other road users. This promotes segregated cycling which is, in my mind, more dangerous than integrated cycling.[/quote'] Please explain what "segregated cycling" and "integrated cycling" would entail. Interesting concepts. Also please dwell on who would be "integrated" in the concept and what or how this will be achieved?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now