Jump to content

Sunblock

Members
  • Posts

    158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sunblock

  1. Our national psychology needs an overhaul <?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> There?s a very easy way to find out whether a rule, or an idea is fair. Very easy. Just apply it to yourself, and see how it feels. If it doesn?t feel good, if it doesn?t feel right, it?s not fair. So imagine a quota system. Players know when they are good enough for a team, and they know when they?re getting a free ride. The players who are good enough also know when those who don?t deserve a place are given a place. Let me repeat this: those who don?t deserve a place also know that there are other players better than what they are, that do deserve a place. That leads to resentment and insecurity, and these additional pressures can break the confidence of a team, let alone the cohesiveness. Then it is very easy for cohesive teams from other countries to defeat our own. Real teamwork, real synergy wins. Faking it with quotas is going to create weak teams that can?t win against the best in the world. If South Africans are going to just shake their heads and then put their heads back in the sand, we can expect a lot more Kevin Pietersen?s (he left SA and is now a leading batsman in the world, playing cricket for <?:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Englandon>) in the world. And can you blame them? People who do sport know what it takes to train, to dig deep, to make sacrifices of sweat, but in many other vital areas too. The problem is, the important decisions are being made on behalf of our country?s determined rugby players, cricketers, swimmers etc, by people who aren?t sportsmen, and behave as if they never were. The decision makers who came up with the reasoning, just the mere idea that the world champion Roeland Schoeman be excluded from the Olympic Team ought to be hauled into a series of public hearings, and after stating their case, ought to be completely and utterly named and shamed, and then fired. Harsh you think? It is a public disgrace! Please tell me how it possibly benefits South Africaon>, and the sport of swimming, to deny our greatest swimmer a place in a team? Exactly what is going on in the minds of the sports officials who manage to come up with the idea, the intention, or even the threat of excluding our first, best hope? The fineprint is irrelevant. Let the administrators frown and fuss over the legislation, and which events need to be attended and why. But give the athlete every opportunity to perform. Give the athlete a license, and the flexibility, to pursue their dreams. And when it comes down to it, between a sanction (not for an offence such as illegal substances of course) and a chance, give the athlete a chance, the opportunity to excel. That makes perfect sense doesn?t it. I have personally been in the position, in triathlon, and recently in cycling, where you are training intensely, and yet uncertainty surrounds your participation in a crucial event. If you want to kill motivation, you must start to make threats and play around with an athlete?s goals. And it?s happening. I feel for Roeland. Imagine the dedication, going through all those hours of training in the pool, meanwhile the echoes of conversation of possible/impossible participation in the Olympics are running through your mind. It?s a terrible place to be mentally, when you?re dedicated to just trying to put a lot of energy out there. And it?s unnecessary. How dare officials put our sportsmen in such a position! Rugby is turning into football?s version of the Soprano?s. Who would ever have believed you?d hear the words ?Jake White? and ?gag order? in the same sentence? Once again, to test the theory (of a quota system in rugby) I have to look at my own experience. I have gone to Cheetah matches in Bloemfontein and you know, I?m not sure if I have seen any black faces in the crowd. And I?ve looked. It?s easier to spot them in the cheerleaders, and in the players on the field. On the other hand, I haven?t gone to watch a single soccer match. So here?s an interesting idea. If we?re going to apply this quota system to cricket and rugby, let?s also do it for soccer. I?m not sure how many black people particularly care about rugby (in comparison to Bafana Bafana). And I?d say the reverse is also true. What concerns me is that a lot of these moves are done out of spite. It?s some official who has felt injured by the past, and now is trying to foist personal justice on an entire country. Remember Sam Ramsamy? I don?t know about you, but it?s becoming a sad dirge: official of color making rulings or sanctions over a hapless white sportsperson for some important sporting event. Please, someone take these officials out of sport, buy them a house in Camps Bay with gravy train money, throw them parties so they can feel important, and those other people, the athletes (remember them?) who seem to have the only healthy agendas ? like the pursuit of excellence ? let them go to get on with it. Politics has crippled our country once. We?ve been isolated and excluded. Those who try to score points with their cynical agendas today must be rooted out. We need a transparent system so that the public and athletes have better access to data, and the people in charge can be held more accountable for their actions. I?d like to end with a cautionary tale. This just goes to show how sick the local attitude is to sport and to sportspeople. We need to overhaul this selfdeating psychology. Really. I recently contacted the South African Cycling Federation, and after making a number of lengthy inquiries, received the same trite response, the same exact response, 4 times in a row (to different communications) from Sylvia Dale. They were obviously copied and pasted and sent again and again, in response to my emails. Racism is obviously not the issue here, but an inflexible, unfriendly, legalistic, self important attitude that cannot but create a schism between athlete and administrator. Lord knows that these people who administrate the lives of athlete ever think of us other than statistics, costs, times and dates. They don?t treat us as human beings, certainly not in the sense of putting themselves in the position of the athlete. It?s these people that are the problem. We shouldn?t allow petty South Africans to take target practice at our athletes. The result is mediocrity (think of the recent Cricket World Cup), and since it has been happening for so long, how can we expect more from our athletes at the 2008 Olympics, or the 2010 World Cup, or the next Rugby World Cup? Sport?s underlying ethic is fairness, and if those who govern and administer the sport can?t even honestly promise and demonstrate fairness, then we how can we expect consistency and excellence from our athletes?
  2. witrot (rename yourself BlameGame, or FingerPointer, or GrootbekGrootGek) jy het 'n moerse groot bek. if you see me in a cycling race, in the free state, please identify yourself, and then we can play. meanwhile, i think you need to shutup until you learn to read and write. Or sign up for medical experiments, it's what you were born for. Meanwhile, Big Mama. not sure if you understand the purpose of a forum. It's to discuss stuff. You seem to criticise people for whatever they say here, as though nothing is supposed to be said. Very few intelligent people openly insult people dumber than themselves, but ironically, it's the dumbest of the dumbest that can't understand anyone else, what they say or what they do. So that part makes sense. Let me explain it to you quickly: Forums are for the discussion of issues, or problems. But you take the position when someone suggests something that they are stupid. Meanwhile, you're writing about blou bulle and girls. This is a cycling forum btw. Do you even have a job that you spend so much time posting inane comments? But spare me a response, I'd rather not know. Oh, and re: your wickedly sharp comment (is that your best effort?): Can you think of anything more powerful than something that can block out the sun?
  3. That's odd. But then it seems like you joined today simply to make this post (it['s your first ever), and you're based in the Western Cape (where SACF is). So perhaps you're biased, or your wife works for them. Bit dodgy I'd say.
  4. What problem did you have? Notice in SA Sport (maybe sport in general) there is more and more outside interference. People getting on the train. Maybe it's because sport is increasingly a reservoir of wealth, a way to earn money (or prestige), even without the person practising the sport at all. Look at what's happening to SA rugby? I think if we want to enjoy sport in this country is has to be sport by the sportpeople, for the sportspeople. Anyone else must go, and we must put systems in place to get rid of people who stand in the way of athletes. Athletes should have easy access to vote or participate in the admin of their own officials. right now there are meetings going on that decide who, what and where, and we aren't even aware of it. think we need to make it far more transparent, and friendlier towards the cyclist. Other sport and government needs to be like that too. And the internet is a great way to enable this sort of thinking.
  5. Why TitusTi, what's your experience? I reckon we must sort it out and find out who the bad apples are.
  6. Thanks, that's a constructive answer. Thing is, I don't want to belong to this club any more. Would you? I can't take part in the Timetrial because as I say, that deadline has passed and they pulled the plug just before the deadline. I'd just like to hold the 2 individuals accountable who were responsible - who are saying I didn't belong to the club in the first place. I've already written off SA's (took a week off work to ride 850km to train btw) - so the issue isn't SA's. I'm getting a license through another body, but I'm kind've looking at CSA's robotic, unfriendly reaction to my communication and going: "Something's not lekker here." Do we have personal agendas, politics etc against cyclists now. We use the rules against them? Are license therte to include cyclists, to mkae them part of something, or as a power ploy, to exclude those sporting people we decide we don't like. Once again, let's see the holistic picture here. Arranging a setup so that people can ride on bicycles in an orderly manner. Seems to me a lot of other white noise and unnecessary bullsh*t is going on.
  7. Don't visit here often, but is Big Mama a jerk? Can you other guys help me out on that question? One of the reasons I am not a CSA member is because my club screwed up. In order to address the problem, you have to be a member. But if your club (ex-club) pulls the p[lug on you just before deadlines to SA Cycle champs, how do you hold people accountable? My own club - well, 2 people - said I was not officially a member. But paid fees, received clothes, and am on the official membership list. But the issue for me is why are there officials who are so unfriendly to us? Aren't they supposed to enable the sport, not act like Pharisees pointing out laws and showing us how important they are? Getting 5 emails that are a carbon copy of the same unhelpful response doesn't seem to me particularly in the interests of cycling, or me. So I wonder if other people are treated like this. It's unacceptable.
  8. I've received the following email 4 or 5 times in a row from SACF. My orginal email was about a page long: Dear Mr Van Der Leek, According to our records you are not a licenced member of CSA.Thus we cannot get involved in the matter. Kind regards Sylvia Dale General Manager Now imagine you're at a police station trying to report a crime, and the officer on duty says to you: "Sir, since you aren't on our system so apparently do not exist. Please (you and your problem) cease to exist at this police station." "But officer, I was hi-jacked/raped/robbed/murdered." "Probably you were murdered because you do not exist." - Actually even an ironic response is not possible, because you keep getting the same response over and over again: "Sir, since you aren't on our system so apparently do not exist. Please (you and your problem) cease to exist at this police station." "Could I speak to someone about resolving this problem?" "Sir, since you aren't on our system so apparently do not exist. Please (you and your problem) cease to exist at this police station." There's something seriously wrong with people who treat other people in this legalistic (impersonal) way. And here we're talking about a sporting body. Sport. People on bicycles. Get real.
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout