Jump to content

GregC

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GregC

  1. A shorter stem (and not a longer stem!) will make a bike feel more twitchy because smaller inputs will have larger effects with a short stem.

     

    It could be that the Scott just has a more aggressive geometry.

     

    FWIW, the first few times I rode my Scott Spark it felt like it was turning in sharper than I had intended. After a few rides I became adjusted to the bike and now it's all good.

     

    Yeah it was only after mucking around so much on the Giant during diy-chain-tensioner-testing riding around in a small courtyard dodging dogs bowls and dogs that I felt a bit wobbly on the Scott.

  2. Thanks for suggestions.

    So far I've given up drinking and ordered a power balance suit from a nice Chinese online store.

     

    -Im a +- 1.6m shortass so my 15" Scott feels like the best fitting bike Ive had. The Giant is large because thats the frame that was going, its a project and I have a teeny 50mm stem on it.

    -Scott has a 75mm stem, if I sit in riding position, handle bar/stem intersection lines up with axel ( i was always told this is a sizing point?)

    -headset seems fine

    -pivots etc feel solid, although rear shock isn't as stiff as i feel it should be (i have it pumped slightly harder than my weight rating currently)

    -My wheel does appear to be sitting closer to the disc side??

    -cant find training wheels in the colour I want

  3. So came to the conclusion that I feel a lot more steady on my slightly scrappy single speed project bike, than I do on my Scott dual suspension.

    My Giant singlespeed has a large frame, the Scott has a small frame. The Scott feels like the front wheel wants to fall over to the side, and feels generally "twitchy", but on the giant I feel like i can ride in a straight line at 0.001 kilometers an hour...

     

    Any suggestions welcome.

    thanks

  4. Im busy constructing a tensioner, I wanted the roller under the chain to maximize the wrap around the rear sprocket, but I cant seem to get the chain length to work in this scenario. If i remove another link, the chain will be too short, but if i leave it as is, it seems way too long and touches the chain stay.

    Running 17 and 34 ratio.

    Any ideas?

    Thanks

  5. Used to get great service at Cajees Princess Crossing, had a look around, was a joke. Young guy "helping" was a bigger joke.

    Me: "Tell me about this bike."

    Him: "Its got a carbon frame"

    Me "Wow. For four thousand rand?"

    Him: "Um. Aluminium."

    Me: "Well which is it?

    Him: "Carbonaluminium"

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout