G-Unit Posted September 5, 2012 Share I'd go for the stumpie. Warrantee, cheaper and a better parts spec. +1. That warranty is worth its weight in gold. I got a brand new frame after finding a small crack on my old stumpy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman Posted September 6, 2012 Share It seems the sh+1. That warranty is worth its weight in gold. I got a brand new frame after finding a small crack on my old stumpy. It looks like the shop where the scott was originally bought will still honer the 5 year warranty on the frame etc. I think the scott will be the bike! Thanks for all your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 6, 2012 Share Did you consider what i said about the different geometries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman Posted September 6, 2012 Share Did you consider what i said about the different geometries? Yes i did Karma. As i'm more a racer the Scott works for me. Not that the stumpy will not work. In my min i decided on the Scott but i'm only seeing the bikes on Monday then ill make my final decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majestic Posted September 6, 2012 Share He'd have to do that anyway... otherwise the claim will be averaged. It's why my crappy old GT dh bike is insured for R 25k. Its replacement is the GT Fury... My bikes are insured on a first loss basis, so if it is insured for R 20 000 that is what I am paid, no average applies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now