Jump to content

Dinamic

Members
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dinamic

  1. " Leg Spring Stiffness (LSS) is a model of elastic energy in the leg, assuming it acts like a spring. It is the maximum vertical force a person generates in a step divided by the displacement during ground contact time." Hope that helps
  2. I don't disagree, and that is exactly my point, the difference between a lot of 20min 5km runners and a 15min 5km is not going to be cadence it is going to be stride length. Your speed is simply stride length * cadence. However a lot of athletes still hear the mantra that you have to run at 180spm and to do so they shorten their stride to achieve a cadence of around 180 thereby handicapping themselves. If you are running at your easy pace you should not generally be running at 180 spm, If you are running at 180 strides / min and your pace is say 6 min a km then your sl is going to be 0.92m/stride. Your limiter is not cadence your limiter is stride length. Can we train to improve stride length? Some Factors effecting Stride ( not exhaustive ) leg spring stiffness, ground contact time, range of motion, strength, muscle recruitment, running form, weight. and yes aerobic conditioning. Some of these automatically will improve over time with consistent training but others would benefit from applied specific training.
  3. I happen to believe that stride length is a very important metric. In fact I would argue that it is what differentiates between ave and top runners. Brownlee when doing a 10km was recorded as 180 spm with a stride length of 1.84m / stride ( approx 1/1 to height) Mo Farrah on a 10000 183 spm stride length 2.01m/stride for a ration of 1:1.15 One of my Age groupers ( 17:30 5km ) 179 spm stride lenght of 1.59 with a ratio of 0.87 Just for ****s and giggles Rudisha in the 800m ran at 194rpm with a stride length of 2.45!!! ( ratio of 1.29/1 Most age group runners have a short stride length and compensate by trying to increase cadence to increase speed. The 180 spm came about from Daniels observations of top class track athletes racing at significant speed not running at easy or steady pace. Your cadence has to be in proportion to your speed/effort. Lastly over striding ( ie landing with the knee significantly behind the landing point ) is often to due to lack of propulsion and limited range of motion and stability all things that can be worked on rather than deliberately shortening your stride to match an arbitary number
  4. Ok if you want to be pedantic call it an accurate measurement of Vo2. It still gives the best measurement of effort over real time compared to HR / Pace. By the way the the the the quote you used was made by Alex Hutchinson in 2018, As the link you kindly supplied showed he did a further article in 2020 which concluded. "But for now, if you’re in the market for a running power device—and if what you really mean by that is a consistently repeatable estimate of oxygen consumption—this data suggests that Stryd is your best bet." This was based on his reading off a study published in the European Journal of Sport Science which concluded that Stryd was " the most repeatable technology for all environment, with the best concurrent validity to Vo2. STRYD is the most recommended tool. We encourage practitioners to use this device." So call the metric what you want, for ease of communication we are saying power, does it allow athletes to better understand their pacing, there efficiency, there form? Anecdotal evidence from the athletes I have personally worked with it yes, because it is accurate, consistent and repeatable.
  5. The STRYD might seem pricey up front but I have athletes that have used the same one day in day out for over three years without issue. When you add in the undisputed accuracy, the additional metrics like form power, Leg spring stiffness and now with the ability to take wind into account it is a steal. Think about how much you pay for running shoes which you will change every 6 months or so. There is a reason some of the worlds top Triathletes and Runners are using STRYD.
  6. 10 - 20 sec intervals at max effort with 40 sec to 2 min recovery are going to force a different training adaption to do 60 sec on and 60 sec off. I actually often prescribe very short intervals, 10- 20 sec in length as a way of improving NM power and recruitment. ( Obviously depends when in the periodisation.) In the majority of cases this will be out on the road on a hill but I do have athletes who are forced to do these type sessions on a treadmill. I know a lot of people feel that the treadmill is a poor substitute for road, but hey I had a novice female Veteran runner do a 9:00 Up Comrades with 80% of her running done on a treadmill. Also Greta Waitz multiple world champ at 10 000m and marathon trained large proportions of her runs on a treadmill.
  7. A suggestion on doing your speed session, 20 sec on 40 sec off seems to be more about anaerobic Capacity building so bearing that in mind I would advise after a solid warm up with some accelerations, stand on the side of the treadmill and put the speed up to 20 sec pace, when ready support yourself on your hands on the rails and jump on, you will be able to be running within a stride or two. At 20 Secs put hands on rails and again jump off. So you dont have to build up pace and slow down. Obviously the distance on the treadmill will not quiet match what you actually do but the important aspect of this session in the 20 sec and the recovery for a short duration can be static.
  8. If you are using STRYD then there own analysis platform PowerCentre uses a Power Duration Curve which was broadly based on the GC system
  9. I like your point re what we call it? A new product that we are involved with is a swimming paddle using similer tech as the STRYD. They have made a conscious decision to use the term FORCE measurement and IMPULSE rather than POWER and avoid that whole argument.
  10. A case in point I have an athlete who recently did 2 * 10km run within a month. One was flat the other had some climbs. In both cases he averaged 305 watts. In the case of the flat he held 3:45/km in the case of the other 3:50/km. in the 2nd his Run efficiency was impacted by the hills from .99 to .97. If we then calculate the course CVI we can then establish individually how elevation impacts the individual runners efficiency and can then accurately predict times at various power over differing known courses.
  11. Can I also recommend The secret of Running by Hans Van Dijk and Ron Van Megan. Bit dry but great research.
  12. One of the biggest markets for STRYD is in Germany and trail runners have been amongst the biggest users.
  13. Hi there In March there was a study published in the European Journal of Sports Science which looked at different running powermeter options. They concluded that with the stryd in particular, " the running power measurement error is very limited, so this external load variable can be confidently used to monitor performance changes for medium to high level athletes."
  14. No way can you describe Kona as flat. Ok not IM France or Lanza, but the Q K is constantly rolling, the pull up to Hawi a bitch of note and a couple of very short sharp ulls as well.
  15. Hey Mate ask she who must be obeyed to drop me a line sometime today re this.
  16. Sorry I lied, not 11:20 time was in fact 11:08:43.
  17. Depends on the individual. I coached one Guy who had not done any training of any sort in over 10 years, had never done a triathlon of any sort and he had entered IM France. Worked with him for 14 weeks training. Did it in 11:20 as well. But in general any healthy person with well structured training could in my opinion complete an IM with 12 months training
  18. Come on Andy when was the last time you were on a turbo at 4:00 AM? Your Mrs yes I agree. LOL
  19. Accept that what you say may be valid experiences of some people fortunately not mine, or those of most of the people I know who have used them. I recall dcrainmakers review of the bushido when it came out. "Without question, the Tacx Bushido raises the bar for computerized trainers." His summary of the genius was also as follows When the going is good – it’s really good and works really well. But when it’s not, well…" which I would not disagree with. Again my own personal experience has been that they work well.
  20. Bit Harsh. I have used tacx since 2005, imagic, Iflow, Genius and bushido. First to accept that the support is poor and that the old fortius software was buggy as hell, but had no problems since the move to TTS3 back in 2010. Run 6 systems and over 20 of my athletes use them without a problem. The real life rides are fun when the rain is coming down and catalyst is great for intervals.
  21. Not going to get a new Bushido for Ipad for R7500 that's for sure
  22. Actually the endless pool is very similer to an open water environment so what you are doing in it is most likely what you are doing on open water.
  23. That is where video plays such an important part. Often in swimming people pervceive that they are doing x and in fact are doing y. Video gives immediate feedback which allows the swimmer to see what they are doing and helps understand the impact that any action has on their overall effectiveness in the water. Because they can then understand this they can then more easily take on board correctional activities and persevere with them. Also by seeing the difference the corrections make positive reinforcement is enhanced.
  24. Don't do weekend courses like Ti but we do video analysis and develop swim programmes for individuals with regular follow ups based on the analysis. Our approach is strongly based on Swim Smooth who are responsible for developing the Swim curriculum and methodologies for British Triathlon Coaching. DM me if interested with your contact details and I will give you a shout
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout