Gasping Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 Holy if you don't do it now I'm gonna campaign to have your "ultimate" status removed. this is not mxit Never been on mxit but I can imagine this must be very close to it' date=' cos all we do all day is get our fingers going, not on a phone but on a keyboard [/quote'] Watch those slippery fingers there Loopy!!!!!!!!
1hill@aTime Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 ok 15 pages and im too lazy are there any pictures of DG?
EigerSA Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 EigerSA dude! Scope is like from the 70's So what? They had t!ts back then to... Scope was awesome! With the stars in just the right places it made you use your imagination... and my imagination hovers only an inch or two above the gutter and it supplies me with images no magazine could compete with SCOPE RULZ! Ag please man' date=' Scope left so much to the imagination that geriatrics in strollers started to look good![/quote'] Perhaps my imagination is a little too wild then but I'd still rather read a scope than a FHM or one of those.... SCOPE STILL RULZ!
Beenie Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 ok 15 pages and im too lazy are there any pictures of DG? Not yet, but my statistical analysis says you should check in at around page 293
Tumbleweed Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 ok 15 pages and im too lazy are there any pictures of DG? nope, but there was one of me that pantani deleted cos this is the version he actually wanted...
Gasping Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 EigerSA, the OTHER magazines are only for those lighties that never developed an imagination. I stand with you on Scope being missed.
GTfan Posted October 5, 2009 Author Posted October 5, 2009 EigerSA dude! Scope is like from the 70's So what? They had t!ts back then to...Scope was awesome! With the stars in just the right places it made you use your imagination... and my imagination hovers only an inch or two above the gutter and it supplies me with images no magazine could compete with SCOPE RULZ! Ag please man' date=' Scope left so much to the imagination that geriatrics in strollers started to look good![/quote']Perhaps my imagination is a little too wild then but I'd still rather read a scope than a FHM or one of those.... SCOPE STILL RULZ! Shellds you should rather go onto http://www.fhm.com cos there they show some titties
Matchstix Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 All the FHM stuff is so unreal. . if you take away the photosho there is nothing to those girls. . if scope was around in 1970's that would be more real than anything.
EigerSA Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 EigerSA dude! Scope is like from the 70's So what? They had t!ts back then to... Scope was awesome! With the stars in just the right places it made you use your imagination... and my imagination hovers only an inch or two above the gutter and it supplies me with images no magazine could compete with SCOPE RULZ! Ag please man' date=' Scope left so much to the imagination that geriatrics in strollers started to look good![/quote'] Perhaps my imagination is a little too wild then but I'd still rather read a scope than a FHM or one of those.... SCOPE STILL RULZ! Shellds you should rather go onto http://www.fhm.com cos there they show some titties Not going to argue there about that... but... Scope's girls were the real deal, they were awesome. Nowadays you can't even be sure if the girls are real or photo manipulated into quasi-perfection! And also the articles were cool
GTfan Posted October 5, 2009 Author Posted October 5, 2009 EigerSA dude! Scope is like from the 70's So what? They had t!ts back then to...Scope was awesome! With the stars in just the right places it made you use your imagination... and my imagination hovers only an inch or two above the gutter and it supplies me with images no magazine could compete with SCOPE RULZ! Ag please man' date=' Scope left so much to the imagination that geriatrics in strollers started to look good![/quote']Perhaps my imagination is a little too wild then but I'd still rather read a scope than a FHM or one of those.... SCOPE STILL RULZ! Shellds you should rather go onto http://www.fhm.com cos there they show some titties Not going to argue there about that... but...Scope's girls were the real deal, they were awesome. Nowadays you can't even be sure if the girls are real or photo manipulated into quasi-perfection! And also the articles were cool You're right, although at the time I was still kind of a wee lad, Scope was the magazine that got me perving over girls at such a young age
Kansas Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 The two timing #^%$& back stabing %^*#$^ pope %&*^%*& plastic #^&*%. Wanda is $%^$%$ goner thanks for the heads up Fruity.
GTfan Posted October 5, 2009 Author Posted October 5, 2009 The two timing #^%$& back stabing %^*#$^ pope %&*^%*& plastic #^&*%. Wanda is $%^$%$ goner thanks for the heads up Fruity.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now