BendeBeer Posted November 16, 2009 Posted November 16, 2009 I see the elites did the Telkom Satellite in 2hrs 24 as opposed to a 2hrs 14 for the 94.7Fun Question time - which race was the toughest for you?I thought the 94.7 was slightly tougher due to 220m of extra elevation and heat and wind factor which would not affect the pro's so much - although the Telkom had Hekpoort...Due to a broken chain I can't really compare times although I would guess an extra 5minutes on the 94.7 for me.
henco Posted November 16, 2009 Posted November 16, 2009 For me the 94.7 was more difficult than Telkom. Most of Telkom was flat, so you can save lots of energy for hekpoort then you do the hill and it is over with. With the 94.7 the climbs were spread throughout the race. Must get these legs stronger for next year:)
Spinnekop Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 The Dome2Dome was the toughest race untill they shortened it.........so 94.7 for now....
Trubie Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 94.7 without doubt94.7 - 44+ km's ascentTelkom - 24 km's ascent Suppose if you're a climber 94.7 wouldnt be your toughest.For me @ 95kg's - def is hardest I've done this year.
scotty Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Albeit a bit shorter and i did not do it this year i think the R4V might be tougher.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now