Jump to content

Fat Boab

Members
  • Posts

    2420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fat Boab

  1. The Styx Six? Invulnerability guaranteed!
  2. Congrats to all! A mate of mine rode and finished 15 mins faster than he felt he was in shape for, but what do the statisticians say about the impact of the route changes on last year's course time?
  3. "Welcome to Jurassic Park!"
  4. A possible Friday topic brewing here...... .
  5. Let's not beat about the bush....it's not allowed and is specifically prohibited in the terms and conditions when you enter legitimately. From memory, I think there's a ban, for a period, from future races for those caught riding under someone else's name (this ban may apply to both parties?). One may argue that it's difficult to police such activity, and I'd agree with you, but the right thing to do is follow the substitution process....
  6. I wonder how they're going to 'police' this? A group ride on an open road, albeit with marshals and police, but it might be tricky to stop someone joining as the ride leaves Northgate.....?
  7. .....(and the goodie bags).
  8. ....drink from a can?
  9. Argus seems to manage it? Granted, the queue-jumping takes place earlier on the way into the start pens? People and patience........!
  10. I've often wondered at such a big race like 947, whether officials shouldn't be policing such behaviour in the start pens? It's Joburg after all - can't be long before fists and wheels start swinging!
  11. 7 mails in the last 7 days.....from a quick check.
  12. .....as is Pooks Hill!
  13. Those last few kms felt anything but short to me! More like a black hole where time dilated and minutes felt like hours.... But I'd agree, probably better to try and be a little ahead of 'schedule' at the bottom of Witkoppen and then explore time dilation.....
  14. And with the new bits of this year's 947, the sense of pacing uncertainty will continue.....
  15. A mate of mine did 3:00:25 +/-3 years ago, he was in the shape of his life but had to have a quick stop to retighten his QR (don't ask why....). He's never got close to that since. Don't be that guy/woman!
  16. Paint it black, ride in all-black kit, and a do some couples counselling interval sessions to overcome the Ringellman effect, and you'll be on the podium top-step in no time......
  17. It's not rocket science....it's more complicated than that! I'm sure it mainly involves the colour of the tandem, and how expensive it is......
  18. You can search on the racetec site. Last year 793 finishers for the 80km. http://results.racetec.co.za/results_by_event.aspx?RID=7704&EN=Sat%2017%2F10%2F2015%20Bestmed%20Satellite%20Road%20Classic%20%2880km%29
  19. Is my webcam on?? Just because I use the internet every day, doesn't mean I understand how it works? Anyway, wrong thread, so my apols....
  20. How's this? Take 2 identical riders, same shape, body mass, power output, efficient cadence etc. Put them on identical single bikes, and presumably they have the same W/kg and the same VAM? Now put them on a tandem with exactly double the bike mass of the single bikes - don't know if this is possible? - and ignoring aerodynamic drag differences due to their inline position, essentially pace lining, then presumably their power output is cumulative (and ignoring drive train efficiency differences) so they put twice the power on the road, so their W/kg is 2W/2kg = W/kg ie the same power to weight at they have separately. Hence the same VAM? Presumably once you have differences between rider in mass and power, you get a mass weighted power:weight ratio, which leads to lower VAMs. Eg rider 1 weighs 100kg and generates 200W (2W/kg), and rider 2 is 80 kg and generates 240 W (3 W/kg), then the pairing can ideally generate 440W with a combined mass of 180kg (2.44W/kg). A lower W/kg so a lower VAM. Throw in the effect of the tandem weight increase, above or below double a single bike mass eg a touring vs a racing tandem, and power:weight goes further south?
  21. Thanks for this. That might confirm the 'perception', but I'm not sure it would explain it? Bike weight? Averaging effect between mis-matched riders? Co-ordination requirement?
  22. Off topic, so apologies, but why are tandems (perceived?) to be slower uphill than a single bike? Do they weigh more than twice a single bike? A.n.other? I've never thought about it, until now.....?
  23. A while ago I took a mate round the Sat Classic route as a training ride. He rode Hekpoort well, albeit at his own conservative pace, and as we rode down the other side before turning onto the Sat rd itself, I suggested the worst was behind him. Thereafter I waited for him at the top of that 'little climb up to the satellite station'; suffice to say when he arrived, I learned some new colourful language that day!
  24. At last, pictures of other people in NZ! For a while I thought NZ consisted solely of deserted parks, cycleways and roads! ;-)
  25. It's actually not too bad, as long as you know the layout, you can manage your effort well. It's only really the left-hand bend, once the hill starts properly, that can cause some 'inner reflection'....
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout