Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've just inherited a 2005 / 2006 Scott Scale 40 from a mate who has thrown his toys out of the cot with dirt riding.

 

It needs a bit of work but nothing major so I thought I'd keep it for riding with the kids and a bit of thrashing about when not on my main bike.

 

Only thing I might have to do is get a new fork but no sure what would be a good option. It's currently got the original manitou Black elite 80 on it and the lockout is shot. Most later scales ran 100mm or should I look around for some NOS 80mm older stock?

Posted

Or, or or... build it as a shitsngiggles bike and put a revelation 140mm up front. :devil:

 

Chances are, if you're riding with the kids, you're going to want to go a bit slower, play around a bit and just have fun. The extra travel will make it into a hooligan bike, and that's a good thing.

 

FWIW I converted my felt q620 100mm hardtail into an AMHT with a 150mm revelation on the front.

Posted

Or, or or... build it as a shitsngiggles bike and put a revelation 140mm up front. :devil:

 

Chances are, if you're riding with the kids, you're going to want to go a bit slower, play around a bit and just have fun. The extra travel will make it into a hooligan bike, and that's a good thing.

 

FWIW I converted my felt q620 100mm hardtail into an AMHT with a 150mm revelation on the front.

 

Now I could get in to that! Just the idea of that has a big grin on the face. Genius.

Posted

How do you guys decide whether the frame can handle the new geometry when changing the front shock to one with more travel?

 

I love hacking things together, but not sure about bicycles.

Posted

How do you guys decide whether the frame can handle the new geometry when changing the front shock to one with more travel?

 

I love hacking things together, but not sure about bicycles.

 

LOL. Hmm. Difficult to decide, really.

 

As far as I went, my felt was gusseted to hell and back at the head tube junctions. And I recall that the Scotts of that era were also heavily made, in order to get extra strength.

 

ALL manufacturers will tell you to go no more than the fork that they spec cos of bla bla bla warranty fishpaste indemnity cover litigation codswallop. But you also have to employ a certain amount of common sense as well.

 

For example - no way I'd put a 160mm fork on a current Scott scale. No way in hell there's enough strength in those joints with all that hydroforming clap-trap and weight weenie-ism.

Posted

And I recall that the Scotts of that era were also heavily made, in order to get extra strength.

 

There are understatements and there is this. It's 'solid' to say the least.

Posted

Sounds reasonable to think that a heavier frame with more meat and welding will be stronger, but it doesn't seem wise to risk a frame failure as it'll probably fail catastrophically when you land at speed.

 

Was playing around with the idea of upgrading my Merida 500 FS with more travel, but was put off by statements about changes in travel stressing the frame at angles it was not designed for and decided on waiting until next year and get a full DH setup instead.

DH machine also means that I can get fatter tyres (2.4 Conti's are almost tight fit on current frame).

/Hijack off

Posted

I've got one of the old Scott 26' er scale 35 I have a Fox RL fork on it :D

 

And some american classics as well. Nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout