limosine Posted May 30, 2008 Share Dit was 2 weke gelede 'n moerse storie oor sekere lede se Avarars was aanstoot gegee aan sekere ander lede----Iemand het gekla dat van die goed te seksueel was. Nou kom Carbon Boy en moan oor die 3 dinge wat nie op die forum hoort nie----Maar sy Avatar gee my aanstoot. Sy siening oor George Bush is niks anders as politiek nie !!!! Wat goed is vir die een is goed vir die ander ----so kan Admin ook die reel uitvoer dat avatars met politiek onder dieselfde kam geskeer word as die oor seks. Ek wag op 'n antwoord van admin My IQ plummeted after reading that. If you're that easily offended get off the internet. Napalm moenie so ernstig wees nie---ek het maar net die avatar as 'n voorbeeld gebruik-dit geld vir postings,avatars en aale goed wat op die forum is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canaris Posted May 30, 2008 Share So are you not getting involved in politics with your posting? Ja jy is reg kona. Carbon boy het die topic opgehaal van seks' date='politiek,Godsdiens. Ek probeer net s? dat as daai 3 dinge nie op die forum is nie sal daar geen probleem wees nie---Ek stem saam met jou !![/quote'] but then there would not be any debate either. Remember to develop you need to acheive synthesis between a thesis and an antithesis. The mechanism of the dialectic. (part of political (oops) philosophy 101) If there is no tension between the thesis and antithesis, then there is no chance for synthesis, and the result is the status quo, or abject boredom. Ergo, no dynamism, no life, no hub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canaris Posted May 30, 2008 Share what avatar HR ?? i dont see nothing ?? ok got the door .... you have managed to anger the man once dubbed: "The Wickedest Man In the World." Is it Alister Crowley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted May 30, 2008 Share Dit was 2 weke gelede 'n moerse storie oor sekere lede se Avarars was aanstoot gegee aan sekere ander lede----Iemand het gekla dat van die goed te seksueel was. Nou kom Carbon Boy en moan oor die 3 dinge wat nie op die forum hoort nie----Maar sy Avatar gee my aanstoot. Sy siening oor George Bush is niks anders as politiek nie !!!! Wat goed is vir die een is goed vir die ander ----so kan Admin ook die reel uitvoer dat avatars met politiek onder dieselfde kam geskeer word as die oor seks. Ek wag op 'n antwoord van admin the truth shall set you free. or alternatively read David Icke.Now I know what's wrong with you.... you're a semi-space creature in reptile form disguised as a human' date=' acting like an elitist and belonging to the Committee of 300![/quote'] is KF from that mini-series called "v"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slowbee Posted May 30, 2008 Share So are you not getting involved in politics with your posting? Ja jy is reg kona. Carbon boy het die topic opgehaal van seks' date='politiek,Godsdiens. Ek probeer net s? dat as daai 3 dinge nie op die forum is nie sal daar geen probleem wees nie---Ek stem saam met jou !![/quote'] but then there would not be any debate either. Remember to develop you need to acheive synthesis between a thesis and an antithesis. The mechanism of the dialectic. (part of political (oops) philosophy 101) If there is no tension between the thesis and antithesis, then there is no chance for synthesis, and the result is the status quo, or abject boredom. Ergo, no dynamism, no life, no hub. and then there will be no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted May 30, 2008 Share what avatar HR ?? i dont see nothing ?? ok got the door .... you have managed to anger the man once dubbed: "The Wickedest Man In the World." Is it Alister Crowley? aleister. there is actually a story about how alick came to that name. you gotta be afraid of someone who has managed this: "I slept with faith and found a corpse in my arms on awakening; I drank and danced all night with doubt and found her a virgin in the morning." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted May 30, 2008 Share So are you not getting involved in politics with your posting? Ja jy is reg kona. Carbon boy het die topic opgehaal van seks' date='politiek,Godsdiens. Ek probeer net s? dat as daai 3 dinge nie op die forum is nie sal daar geen probleem wees nie---Ek stem saam met jou !![/quote'] but then there would not be any debate either. Remember to develop you need to acheive synthesis between a thesis and an antithesis. The mechanism of the dialectic. (part of political (oops) philosophy 101) If there is no tension between the thesis and antithesis, then there is no chance for synthesis, and the result is the status quo, or abject boredom. Ergo, no dynamism, no life, no hub. you a marxist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canaris Posted May 30, 2008 Share So are you not getting involved in politics with your posting? Ja jy is reg kona. Carbon boy het die topic opgehaal van seks' date='politiek,Godsdiens. Ek probeer net s? dat as daai 3 dinge nie op die forum is nie sal daar geen probleem wees nie---Ek stem saam met jou !![/quote'] but then there would not be any debate either. Remember to develop you need to acheive synthesis between a thesis and an antithesis. The mechanism of the dialectic. (part of political (oops) philosophy 101) If there is no tension between the thesis and antithesis, then there is no chance for synthesis, and the result is the status quo, or abject boredom. Ergo, no dynamism, no life, no hub. you a marxist? Hegel. Marx was a poor student that could not write clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limosine Posted May 30, 2008 Share what avatar HR ?? i dont see nothing ?? ok got the door .... you have managed to anger the man once dubbed: "The Wickedest Man In the World." Maak nie saak wie hy is nie-------Hy lyk nog steeds KWAAI !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canaris Posted May 30, 2008 Share what avatar HR ?? i dont see nothing ?? ok got the door .... you have managed to anger the man once dubbed: "The Wickedest Man In the World." Maak nie saak wie hy is nie-------Hy lyk nog steeds KWAAI !!! Crowley was one evil guy. I am surprised the christain lobby has been so quiet on the topic, for so long. Somuch for knowing the enemy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted May 30, 2008 Share .holy roller2008-05-30 02:01:54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canaris Posted May 30, 2008 Share So are you not getting involved in politics with your posting? Ja jy is reg kona. Carbon boy het die topic opgehaal van seks' date='politiek,Godsdiens. Ek probeer net s? dat as daai 3 dinge nie op die forum is nie sal daar geen probleem wees nie---Ek stem saam met jou !![/quote'] but then there would not be any debate either. Remember to develop you need to acheive synthesis between a thesis and an antithesis. The mechanism of the dialectic. (part of political (oops) philosophy 101) If there is no tension between the thesis and antithesis, then there is no chance for synthesis, and the result is the status quo, or abject boredom. Ergo, no dynamism, no life, no hub. you a marxist? Hegel. Marx was a poor student that could not write clearly. my fella kant could drink your fella under the table? THe Germanic school of philosphy (1830-1900) was possibily more liberal and subtle (and complex) than either the French or the English positive approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted May 30, 2008 Share So are you not getting involved in politics with your posting? Ja jy is reg kona. Carbon boy het die topic opgehaal van seks' date='politiek,Godsdiens. Ek probeer net s? dat as daai 3 dinge nie op die forum is nie sal daar geen probleem wees nie---Ek stem saam met jou !![/quote'] but then there would not be any debate either. Remember to develop you need to acheive synthesis between a thesis and an antithesis. The mechanism of the dialectic. (part of political (oops) philosophy 101) If there is no tension between the thesis and antithesis, then there is no chance for synthesis, and the result is the status quo, or abject boredom. Ergo, no dynamism, no life, no hub. you a marxist? Hegel. Marx was a poor student that could not write clearly. my fella hume could drink out consume your fella? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duathlete Posted May 30, 2008 Share Let me get the pop corn and pizza's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canaris Posted May 30, 2008 Share okay here it all is: Immanuel Kant was a real pissant Who was very rarely stable. Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar Who could think you under the table. David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel, And Wittgenstein was a beery swine Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel. There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya' 'Bout the raising of the wrist. SOCRATES, HIMSELF, WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED... John Stuart Mill, of his own free will, On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill. Plato, they say, could stick it away; Half a crate of whiskey every day. Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle, Hobbes was fond of his dram, And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart: "I drink, therefore I am" Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed! http://www.metrolyrics.com/images/l/62667.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted May 30, 2008 Share Crowley was one evil guy. I am surprised the christain lobby has been so quiet on the topic' date=' for so long. Somuch for knowing the enemy?[/quote'] I'm sure he was not all bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now