Jump to content

Climber or a Racer ?


CharlV

Recommended Posts

the thread title confuses me. More than usual.

 

If you climb, you may not race. It's one or the other. Climbing is not racing. and Racing is not Climbing. or something.

 

Does that help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you climb, you may not race. It's one or the other. Climbing is not racing. and Racing is not Climbing. or something.

 

Does that help?

Dunno so much... :huh:

 

There are sprinters.

There are climbers.

 

That is a distinction. Maybe title can thus read "Climber Or Sprinter?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all about weight,speaking from my personal experience.When I started I could not climb a speedbump muchless a hill like suikerbossie.Went to a dietician.Went from 141kgs(1.91m) to 96kg. I love hills now

 

Dude that's like loosing a person !!!! Frikkadelle e!!!%^&^%$#@!:thumbup::clap::clap::thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The specs for Andy Schleck and how his measured up to fit his Trek (from cyclingnews,com):

 

Rider's height: 1.86m (6' 1")

Rider's weight: 68kg (150lb)

 

Wow! :blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout