I think we're perhaps conflating two separate, but related, interest groups. Asking that question to dogmatic animal rights activists would be similar to asking the Jewish community if 'just a little bit of Antisemitism is okay'. Granted, it's not a particularly elegant comparison, but you get where I'm coming from. Remember, in whichever movement, you're going to have people who fall on a spectrum, with dogmatism on the one hand and pragmatism on the other hand. Personally, I like to consider myself a pragmatist - I have no qualms accepting that 97% of a population strongly curbing their animal consumption will have a greater net effect than 3% vegan. So, I'll encourage that reduction. Like I said, I'll still advocate for veganism, because of the ethical aspects (why kill and torture defenseless animals if you don't have to) and the fact that greater benefits can be netted by fully plant-based than just 'a little bit of meat'.
