Sure but you also never posted with he said the skill is good. But anyway this isnt the point.
The process should be this in my view:
Both parties are int he wrong and 2 wrongs dont make a right. If it was then I would be with my ex still heavens forbid.
The criteria needs to possibly change to allow a simpler or less aggressive points system.
Riders need to understand that its not easy, it takes committed and skillset.
Both parties need to abide by their rules set out by both rider and federation.
Injuries and illness happen. It's a tough sport but then have a clause for this possibly.
Riders need to understand this is a freebie handout process.
CSA need to understand its tough for South Africans to qualify and to raise to the level needed
And much more.
From an enviroment I have had riders and grown men crying like babies on the phone to me cause they weren't selected for the Tour de France, why? they never filled the teams criteria, there was no "ill pay and go" it was simple you weren't good enough.
You can argue it is the same but it is not, it's hi performance sport, Yes you can learn there, but you going cause you full ready and you learn mostly before the big event not at it.
How many WChamps have these riders done? They would all be learning I presume so from that how many have improved their WChamps results progressively each time they went? I dont have this info result wise but this would be a good indication of what they learnt, went home, worked on it and went back for a better result.
