Jump to content

Armstrong considers lie detector test to prove innocence


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Millar's an interesting case. He never tested positive. Yet he got a ban.

Much like Ulrich and some others, never found positive but banned on other evidence.

 

Millar admitted doping between 2001 and 2003 supposedly to give him the edge as he was falling behind. The question i have with current riders who have admitted to doping and say it was to give them an edge but now claim to be clean, how is it they suddenly have the edge back without doping.

Posted

Much like Ulrich and some others, never found positive but banned on other evidence.

 

Millar admitted doping between 2001 and 2003 supposedly to give him the edge as he was falling behind. The question i have with current riders who have admitted to doping and say it was to give them an edge but now claim to be clean, how is it they suddenly have the edge back without doping.

 

Yeah, it's not like the peloton has slowed that much. And you get the sprinters who aren't suffering too badly in the hill, etc…

Posted

how is it they suddenly have the edge back without doping.

 

2 possibilities -

1) the rest are clean as well, so their natural athletic ability shines through (hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha)

2) they're not clean

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout