[Infographic] 2012 Year on The Hub in review - By the numbers

[Hairy]

  On 12/14/2012 at 7:03 AM, Mr SingleTrack said:

I would like to see the top 10 for most time spent on the hub

 

A bit subjective as I leave the site open on my PC in the background through the day.

[CAAD4]

A good year in many ways. Emily still drives me Batty. Thanks for the T Shirts Matt.

[Tumbleweed]

  On 12/14/2012 at 7:37 AM, CAAD4 said:

A good year in many ways. Emily still drives me Batty. Thanks for the T Shirts Matt.

 

Emily broke my heart…

[Escapee..]

I would like to know more about the 30%

 

Pics or it didnt happen

[MTBc]

  On 12/14/2012 at 6:19 AM, Carpet said:

Yes they should measure the number of "likes" to number of posts ratio.

 

definitely makes more sense. if i have the stats correct from a profile (# of likes / # of active posts * 100), then some members look like

 

TNT1: 3%

'Dale: 4%

Dangle: 23%

Carpet: 29%

Karma: 31%

Me: 32%

Stretch: 62.8% (based on revised formula and "no-one liked me before this year" assumption).

Dangle: 98.4 % (new formula)

Hayleyearth: almost 100%

 

needless to say, I'm having a severe case of Friday morning procrastination @ work. time to get properly productive now.

 

*edit*: if you are vaguely interested by this comment, there's a little blue button on the right you can click. having a good like to comment ratio will make my day |-----------------------------| <-- that much better.

 

*edit 2* no longer updating this. In Admin we trust (check further down the fred for more stats straight outta the database).

[Tumbleweed]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:16 AM, BrettMTB said:

definitely makes more sense. if i have the stats correct from a profile (# of likes / # of active topics * 100), then some members look like

 

TNT1: 3%

'Dale: 4%

Dangle: 23%

Carpet: 29%

Karma: 31%

Me: 32%

Hayley: 49%

 

 

needless to say, I'm having a severe case of Friday morning procrastination @ work. time to get properly productive now.

 

Add another element to your procrastination…work it out from when the like feature was introduced…

[MTBc]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:19 AM, Tumbleweed said:

Add another element to your procrastination…work it out from when the like feature was introduced…

 

In general? or if the comment was liked in the same year as the comment was made? Should comments from 2011 that were liked in 2012 still be considered, or should the ratio just be calculated on 2012 stats? probably just on 2012..... thank goodness I can't see that data. today would be done if I could.

[Tumbleweed]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:22 AM, BrettMTB said:

In general? or if the comment was liked in the same year as the comment was made? Should comments from 2011 that were liked in 2012 still be considered, or should the ratio just be calculated on 2012 stats? probably just on 2012..... thank goodness I can't see that data. today would be done if I could.

 

Bwahahahahaha!

 

I am trying to kill the last two hours of the work day…

 

Can't do numbers! Although using your formula, I was like 0.01% or something…

[Stretch]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:16 AM, BrettMTB said:

definitely makes more sense. if i have the stats correct from a profile (# of likes / # of active topics * 100), then some

 

what is that? and how did you work that out

[Tumbleweed]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:26 AM, Stretch said:

what is that? and how did you work that out

 

I think he means active posts…

[MTBc]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:26 AM, Stretch said:

what is that? and how did you work that out

 

Click through to a user profile. On the overview: "Active Posts" is the first item. I'm not sure what "active posts" means, but assuming its "how posts you have made". The green box at the top right indicates number of likes.

[MTBc]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:24 AM, Tumbleweed said:

Bwahahahahaha!

 

I am trying to kill the last two hours of the work day…

 

Can't do numbers! Although using your formula, I was like 0.01% or something…

 

We could chuck in a couple of assumptions to get a more accurate figure based on 2012.

 

You have been registered since 2007. If we made 2 assumptions:

A) number of posts per year is more or less consistent.

B) No-one liked any of your posts before 2012

 

Then your ratio jumps up to 10% !!

[MTBc]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:28 AM, Tumbleweed said:

I think he means active posts…

 

sorry, yeah, typo. s/topics/posts/

 

fixed.

[Stretch]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:28 AM, BrettMTB said:

Click through to a user profile. On the overview: "Active Posts" is the first item. I'm not sure what "active posts" means, but assuming its "how posts you have made". The green box at the top right indicates number of likes.

 

aaah then you statistic is flawed because likes only came about in the last year.....

[MTBc]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:33 AM, Stretch said:

aaah then you statistic is flawed because likes only came about in the last year.....

 

damn. i thought i was onto something.

[Tumbleweed]

  On 12/14/2012 at 8:32 AM, BrettMTB said:

We could chuck in a couple of assumptions to get a more accurate figure based on 2012.

 

You have been registered since 2007. If we made 2 assumptions:

A) number of posts per year is more or less consistent.

No-one liked any of your posts before 2012

 

Then your ratio jumps up to 10% !!

 

Your manipulation of stats has earned you a like, sir!