Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

New to this power thing, so hopefully someone can help me out.

 

Can you extrapolate a 10min normalised power output to give you your FTP.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

 

New to this power thing' date=' so hopefully someone can help me out.

 

Can you extrapolate a 10min normalised power output to give you your FTP.[/quote']

 

Hi - you would be strongly advised not to do this as due to the high anaerobic content of a 10 min NP interval, you could be miles off.

 

I would suggest at least a 20 min AP interval (maybe on a climb but at least steady power) and take 95% for a "reasonable" FTP estimate. Even this length may have a percentage of anaerobic work that makes it unreliable.

 

Once you have an idea then I would suggest a set of 2 x 20 intervals flat out but evenly paced and take the average you can maintain for both as a pretty good guide.

 

Better still - 60 min TT Big%20smile

 

Posted

Thanks Bikemax. In the interim I've done 2 x 20 intervals on a computrainer and used 95% of the higher power interval to calculate my FTP.still need to get the courage to do a 60 min TT on the computrainer.

 

Out of interest (anyone out there) would it it be alright to do the intervals on a 2% gradient rather than a flat course. Seems I have more motivation on an incline.

Posted
On the IDT I get about 6 to 8% less.

 

I find the same thing. I'm more inclined to think that the difference is due to motivation (or lack thereof!) rather than heat.

 

I think that it is best to test your FTP on an incline as it prevents you from slacking or freewheeling. However if the incline is to steep then I think that you can inflate your results by going into the VO2 max zone.
Posted

I saw numbers being thrown about of about a 15% difference, which seemed a little high. The 6 to 8% seems more realistic.

 

Currently I do the FTP test or rather a 20min test on an incline which varies between 1.5 to 2.5%. The interval lasts about 24min in total. Seems a lot "easier" than a pancake flat course

 

Odion2008-03-19 06:14:55

Posted

My theory is that it is easier to pedal against a steady resistance, but there are other theories. I seem to recall this being discussed on the Hub a while back and on cyclingnews.com.

I don't think that you would get inflated results from a 1.5 to 2.5 % incline.
Posted

An incline is great, but if you don't have one handy and live in the Cape, just wait for the Southeaster to howl and hit it head on.  Does the trick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout