Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Had a really long day at Ironman this year... 5 years of bike hassles in 180kms....

Best be forgotten

 

Nonetheless - this got me thinking. Why does no-one ride a 1-11 setup on a TT bike?

Answers to my own questions would be:

  • minimal weight saving (Cabling, derailleur, chainring, shifter etc...dont add up to much)
  • Any weight saving would be reduced by having to add a chain guide
  • Gap between gears is too large. Optimal cadence is in a very narrow range of maybe 5 rpm (not sure what Sheldon Brown says about this)

My situation further compounded by running Osymmetric (not Rotor etc...) front rings.

 

Thoughts?

Posted

I want them to develop a wide/narrow chainring for TT bikes as well. If they could make a 53, 54 or 56, then I will buy it. Most TT's are anyway on flattish roads and how many people shift up front when using that bike.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I want them to develop a wide/narrow chainring for TT bikes as well. If they could make a 53, 54 or 56, then I will buy it. Most TT's are anyway on flattish roads and how many people shift up front when using that bike.

Ironman 70.3 and IMSA are both very hilly courses

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout