Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

one of the major reasons is that you'd have to have stronger forks with lugs on to support the callipers.

 

 

 

Another reason is that sort of stopping power isn't really necessary in road races. Although it would solve some of the hassles with carbon-specific brake pads etc.

 

 

 

 

Posted
one of the major reasons is that you'd have to have stronger forks with lugs on to support the callipers.

Another reason is that sort of stopping power isn't really necessary in road races. Although it would solve some of the hassles with carbon-specific brake pads etc.

 

Tell that to JLABig%20smile
Posted

Contrarary to popular belief, disk brakes don't offer better "stopping power." Good calliper brakes stop a bike as quickly as good disc brakes. I agree with the notion that a beefier fork would be required.

On modern double-diamond road bicycles (technically called the Rover Safety Bike), the limiting factor in coming to a stop is not a function of the brakes but a function of overturning. You'll overturn the bike long before you lose traction on the front wheel. 

 

Disk brakes on road bikes only make sense on tandems where wheels routinely overheat and blow off the tyre. Disks can take a bit more heat without any adverse affect.

 

Disk brakes transmit torque through the spokes and hence rule out radial spoking and of course, weight a bit more than calliper brakes.

 

Disk brakes make wheels difficult to clean and road bikes with disk brakes will always look as filthy as their MTB cousins. I also agree that it looks crappy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout