NotSoBigBen Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 A new High Court judgment means cyclists who don't wear helmets can be guilty of contributory negligence if they are injured in a road accident in the UK.http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/court-judgment-has-major-implications-for-cyclists-20250
AndreZA Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 That would be so nice. Imagine if medical aids refuse to pay because you did not wear a helmet. I say bring it on.
NotSoBigBen Posted February 4, 2009 Author Posted February 4, 2009 That would be so nice. Imagine if medical aids refuse to pay because you did not wear a helmet. I say bring it on. - guess it would make a coupla okes think twice, not sure about the infamous oubee though seems he may be immune ........
idrive Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 That would be so nice. Imagine if medical aids refuse to pay because you did not wear a helmet. I say bring it on. Believe it or not, but most medical aids have a clause about risks etc and they could reject a claim.
Evan Andreou Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 You've got to love first world legal systems
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now