Sealant question

[Cassie]

Not sure how OKO compares' date=' but this is a test STAN did a while ago in the US - silenced all the critics.

 

Yes, shelf cost is slightly higher, but STAN's outlasts all it's competition. http://www.notubes.com/movie_sealant.php

[/quote']

I think maybe the best would be to initially do the conversion with stans and then after the sideawalls are sealed add a thicker and cheaper sealant once the stans begin to dry.

 

I see the use of the liquid sealant for the intial proces, what would the pros and cons be of thin vs. thick sealants for plugging holes ?

Maybe the thicker one will seal bigger holes and/or glass cuts, small sidewall cuts where the thin sealant cant ?

 

Also, does oko have amoniak, ie. making the tyres bubble ?

I think most sealants do(stans and joes), though Sludge has one that is amonium/ak free ?

 

Three comments: For bigger punctures/ cuts etc...there is NOTHING that will beat OKO - period...non debatable  in my opinion...stans will loose a battle of hole sizes - purely because it is non fibre!! 

 

Secondly, that Styans video impressed me very much - BUT that tyre is inflated to way higher that what you would ride on in real life!! The whole reason for tubliss is to ride lower pressures and all that goes along with that.

 

Thirdly, OKO is not ammonia base or anything nasty from what i can gather...let's call it "eco friendly"....for the bunny huggers out there...

 

 

 

[CAAD4]

OKO is all natural fibre, almost likes nature's little brooms in your cereal...