MooToo Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Keith Litten was tested positive on 18th June 2006 during the Veterans Tour for Testosterone/Epitestosterone and found guilty as charged and suspended for 2 years reduced to one year under Article 265. Yet he race in the Vets category in the 94.7 and R4S in 2007. How is this possible?
Pantani Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Anything is possible!!! Just by the way, I don't know if you know this but you're the only clean cyclist out there...
epoh Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 his ban was only for 1 year.. he is free to compete again
buckstopper Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 The sad thing is some that people, almost 50, need drugs to stay in touch with the cream of the 45-49 bunch. Pathetic actually, when one considers that at this age it's for fun. So you come 4th and need some help to do it. And then you look at yourself in the mirror. What's the fun of that. I'm sure there are many more Vets who haven't quite accepted their genetic inheritance (or lack thereof) yet.buckstopper2007-10-13 04:43:21
GreyOwl Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Well, he's done his ban sentence and therefore he's free to compete again... It is scary to think that the Vets are resorting to Pharmaceutical Enhancement?!
Satan Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Doping in the Vets!! I love it!! Its a wonderfull thing to see someone SO pathetic, trying so desperately to be someone in Vets when he obviously never had enough talent as a youngster!!! Go Dianabol!!! At least we can all laugh at the "Geriatric jUICER!"
homer Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Because we are all licensed to ride the Argus i will have to be careful if they start testing the old guys in the OF bunch
Turk182 Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Because we are all licensed to ride the Argus i will have to be careful if they start testing the old guys in the OF bunch well they'll only find black label and some jack in my blood stream....
MooToo Posted October 14, 2007 Author Posted October 14, 2007 his ban was only for 1 year.. he is free to compete again Let me see, caught on the 18th June 2006, rides 94.7 in Nov 2006 and R4S in Feb 2007. So when does the 1 year ban start?
javadude Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 Perhaps the testosterone wasn't for his cycling performance, but rather for performance in other pursuits (wink wink, nudge nudge) that start to wane after a certain age.
Satan Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 Well,if he rode under his ban period, then CSA should be called to task...but then they have a sketchy history with overlooking ban periods, or actually acknowledging them...remember JP Van Zyl '99? I say, test positive once and your done. Leopards never change their spots...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now