Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Hubbers

 

Last year I was signed on to do the Berg and Bush and pulled out cause of injury but want to do another stage race this year. So looking at doing either one of these two - Whale 2 Whales or Berg and Bush. Any thoughts or the races and which one to do? Im based in CPT but can always fly up to Natal again.

 

Thanks

Posted

I havent done either, but was chatting to a guy yesterday whose done sani and berg n bush. He reckons Berg is by far better value for money and probably the best stage race out there (if you can get into it). He did the 2 day and the 3 day and reckons the descent (3 day i think it is) is the better of the two. :)

Personally I would kill to do either one.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I havent done either, but was chatting to a guy yesterday whose done sani and berg n bush. He reckons Berg is by far better value for money and probably the best stage race out there (if you can get into it). He did the 2 day and the 3 day and reckons the descent (3 day i think it is) is the better of the two. smile.gif

Personally I would kill to do either one.

 

Fish Eagle - there are still spots available for the Berg & Bush Great Trek - we got in on Tuesday (19/6/2012)

Posted

It's Wine to Whales isn't it? :blink: :ph34r:

:D Caught out by my own dyslexia again! Yeah, don't like the idea of Whales to Whales.

 

The Wines to Whales Adventure, however, I really enjoyed a huge lot last year. Well organised, great route, lots of single track. Haven't done Berg & Bush so cannot compare.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout