Eddy, this was a requirement in the first week after the fire. Getting answers was a priority for TokaiMTB and as such, after a lengthy telephone conversation TMNP, it was agreed that a press release would help the users understand the reasons for the closure. Still not satisfied, TokaiMTB went back in for a discussion several weeks later and the reasons included below were explained in greater detail. Points of this discussion was sent out in all our comms channels. There seems to be those who understand and respect the reasons for the closure, and while unhappy about the length of time, support the need for rehab. They must surely see the opportunity for a revised trail network with many of the limitations now out of the way because of the fires, namely; 1. the dragged out remaining 10 years until the Pine exit was due to be completed - the restraint was that only when all the pines were cleared could the area be studied for trail suitability. 2. Before the fire, compartments where Pines were being felled required the correct procedure from a conservation pov to burn to restore the dormant seed bank. Parks were not getting the permission as the risk surrounded by pine was too great. Now with the fire, the pines are being pulled this year meaning; 1. we have a greatly reduced timeframe in which to plan new trails in one go. 2. The conservationists have their fire and with that there is a reduced risk that when all the pines were eventually cleared, the trails could have been affected by the delayed burns. See below the facts around the closures, facts that TnT are saying never made it to public view. It cannot be argued, safety is important along with the critical conservation effort being carried out in this National Park. Jonkershoek is a poor comparison for all the above reasons. It is important also not to confuse the closure with a call made by Table Mountain National Park. Another fact is that as curators, they take their mandate from others. Equally important is that while the exit lease is being fulfilled, Table Mountain National Park have a legal obligation to accommodate Cape Pine's request to clear all the pine unhindered by riders and hikers and horse riders, all of whom have never been able to stay clear of extremely hazardous felling operations. For proof, look at the tone Bennet had to take around access in Jonkershoek. Cape Pine threatened a blanket closure if rules could not be adhered to. Fact is we have our answers, but some do not accept them. PRESS RELEASE - SILVERMINE AND TOKAI TO REMAIN CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC.pdf
