Jesus H Martinez, there is some wild 'science' on this thread... (And let me say that as someone who supports the vegan orinciple but who is 'hypocritical' or, alternatively, self-aware enough to make a concious choice to eat limited amounts of meat based on a holistic assessment of health, welfare and conversely, the negative effects of pure veganry, or as it appears to some 'devilry' on people. The science is not settled on this, people. There are many aspects - global warming, personal health, overpopulation/nutritional production, eg. I know which way I think it leans (heavily), currently hence my support above. Which brings me to my main point. Even if your answer is 'I don't know which side the science falls' there is still an ethical decision to be made. Because that is where personal preference over the facts, and the associated hypocrisy sit, of which I am fully cognisant I still have some Separate those and stop mangling them together and perhaps we may even have some kumbaya...) I mean, kambucha.
