I have been riding in Cape Town for about 34 years when there were very few bike paths and currently I am wishing that the same was still the case. The City does not plan bike paths correctly and in most case leave cyclist worse off rather than better off. They seem to want to be able to say - wow look what we doing for cycling - but the reality is leaving cyclist worse off. Even the 1m meter law leave cyclist worse off considering the previous law which was never enforces was a vehicle overtakes in a separate lane. When they brought in the one meter law they then added that a vehicle may cross a solid barrier line while passing a cycling - what can I say only in Africa. The barrier line is their for a reason. On one of my favorite training routes, new bike path are about to be opened and they are terrible - I have written letter to the city including PPA but nothing seems to be done. The new bike path on Firgrove way - Constantia although in my opinion in the correct place the surface is so bumpy - I don’t know why the put tar over it - I am a road biker. Below some of my communication with the city - but yet nothing happens and PPA who probably should be offering way more advice on the road bike path seem more interested in MTB bike paths. I have left the email address as if other cyclist using these route are also concerned maybe write an email thus getting more cyclist voices heard. Please also see my email to PPA just below expressing this - PPA have been told about the problem and now the answer is don’t use the cycle path! Great solution by PPA for road cycling - NOT. From: Peter <> Subject: Cycle path and Roads Plumstead / Tokai / Lakeside / Muizenberg area - PPA Date: 06 September 2016 at 7:50:45 PM SAST To: robert@pedalpower.org.za, Cc: Steve Hayward Hi All Andrew and I examined the various bike paths around Constantia, Kirstenhof and Lakeside this morning, so as to get an understanding of areas where improvements could be made and new facilities could be implemented as a recommendation to the CoCT. Simultaneous to the site visits I received the mail below from the City, which raised a concern for me. Andrew will raise this at a meeting with the CoCT on Thursday. The general motorist accepts when there is a bike path that all cyclist should be using it. When I receive a communication "We accept that professional cyclists (sport cyclists) will be more inclined to remain on the road in this instance", this sends a red flag to me – as many motorists are aggravated by cyclists in the vehicle lane next to them when a separate facility is parallel. Robert, you mentioned to me that one committee member is active in the advocacy for bike paths, which is great. Quote from email from Robert 29th August "The City has asked for a Cycling Strategy and one of our Exco members was part of that project and has submitted the first part to the City." My view is that this needs to be explored further, as in many instances segregated facilities are not the answer – rather it is one of keeping the flow as normal as possible so as to not interrupt the direction and speed of both cyclists and motorists. What is needed is signage, and a facility that can be seen and respected by the motorists – but that does not diminish from the levels of quality that cyclists now enjoy. My fear is that segregated facilities worsen the flow of cycling traffic. I would be greatly encouraged if PPA can apportion more of its considerable budget to ensuring road safety and giving more time and effort to aspects governing road cycling. Whilst I can respect the need for efforts to look after MTB trails, PPA was born out of a road cycling event, with the ambition to create safer and more user-friendly routes for road cyclists (sport and commuter) and this has, to a large extent, been lost. Is it possible that PPA could reassign a staff member (or strengthen the support of an existing one) to put more time and value to addressing the road issue? This would be most appreciated. Andrew and I hope that the specific guidelines and focus areas will bring about an intervention that addresses the facilities in the southern peninsula, including cycle paths currently under construction on Firgrove and Tokai roads to ensure that they are suitable for all cyclists. The City is demonstrating a commitment to spend money on cycle paths - surely PPA should be there to assist that they spend it correctly? Regards Peter Wheeler Dear Mr Fortuin, With regards to this comment "We accept that professional cyclists will be more inclined to remain on the road in this instance.” It is clear that the law does not allow for this. When a cycle lane exists, in whatever shape or form, the law is clear – it must then be used by cyclists. This does create a problem in the event of the bike facility being less than adequate – surface quality, non-maintenance, or other design imperfections currently noticed on the Kendal road bike path. More information can be found at: http://www.bicyclecapetown.org/bike-law/rules-of-the-road/ "Duties of cyclists 3. (1) A cyclist riding on a public road must— (a) if the road has a pedal cycle lane, ride only in the pedal cycle lane and may not ride on any other portion of a public road except when crossing the road; or” Regards Peter Wheeler On 06 Sep 2016, at 11:48 AM, Brendon Fortuin <Brendon.Fortuin@capetown.gov.za> wrote: Dear Mr Wheeler I have copied in the depot manager for this area to assist you. Wrt to the NMT along Kendal Road, as this is an off road facility it is accepted that the use will mainly be for commuter and recreational purposes with a yield to vehicles at all intersections signalised or not. We accept that professional cyclists will be more inclined to remain on the road in this instance. Regards Brendon Fortuin Pr Tech Eng District Manager : Plumstead (South) Infrastructure and Plant Maintenance 2nd Floor, Municipal Office No. 3 Victoria Road, Plumstead Fax: 021 444 3808 brendon.fortuin@capetown.gov.za <image001.png> From: Peter [] Sent: 05 September 2016 03:09 PM To: Brendon Fortuin Subject: Re: Roads Plumstead / Tokai / Lakeside / Muizenberg area Dear Mr Fortuin, I hope you don’t mind there are quite a few pics in this email. I met with some your pot hole team hard at work today outside Pollsmoor (they had already done the other 2 potholes in the middle of the M42 I had reported), after I explain what was wrong with the current repair job in terms of riding a bicycle - fortunately at the time the road was wet and puddles of water were very visible in the repair job - they understood my explanation and have proceeded - pics below. As cyclist we are expected to hold our line and stay left and thus most of my reports are to do with the road - within 1 meter of the side of the road and the condition of the road in this area. I will also report potholes noticed further into the road - like on the M42 repaired today. I am also very interested to know how the signage will work on what I believe is going to be a cycle path along Kendal road - I am not sure if you have the answers to this. What concerns me is if this is going to be a cycle path who is going to be expected to yield at the intersections Edison drive and Owen drive. At present cycling on Kendal road if continuing straight then car turning into these 2 road should wait for cyclist. I hope with these new cycle path this will remain the same otherwise the cycle path has basically rendered itself useless to cyclist out training and cyclist training will probably end up back on the road. Please let me know if I must send a report via the city website for all the concerns below in this mail or if it will been seen to by yourself? Below are some areas work on already, the ones worked onto day and some areas which need work. If you feel it would be helpful to meet with myself I will quite happily make the time available. Regards Peter Wheeler