Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

so who is fibbing to me my MTB computer, Endomondo or my GPS signal?

 

 

On Bike Computer

 

AVS/17.3 - Dst/ 41Km time 2h43 and on Endomondo as per below Mmmm

 

 

ENDOMONDO

 

Derek Miller was out mountain biking. He tracked 19.85 km in 1h:17m:33s.

First personal best One hour of 16.41 km .

Posted

so who is fibbing to me my MTB computer, Endomondo or my GPS signal?

 

 

On Bike Computer

 

AVS/17.3 - Dst/ 41Km time 2h43 and on Endomondo as per below Mmmm

 

 

ENDOMONDO

 

Derek Miller was out mountain biking. He tracked 19.85 km in 1h:17m:33s.

First personal best One hour of 16.41 km .

 

Ok This was fast, Endomondo techs Emailed me, they advised that It stopped recording at 19km.. Mmmm why is the question

Posted

What phone do you have? My Blackberry's signal cuts out when there is 5% battery left, so no more update, but still finish the workout. Then when I charged my phone, just went on Endo, uploaded the workout again and the full workout is availiable agaim. Hope this helps somehow

Posted

I gave up on Endomondo, after only switching to it again after everyone was raving about it on here, due to the perceived inaccuracies on my Nokia N8. And it is not the GPS chip as that phone has a great one. Parts of the trail were being cut off and when transferring online it would lose some of the data and not allow a reupload. Sportstracker follows my trails with pretty decent accuracy, obviously as with any GPS some tight corners may be missed but nothing major like Endomondo.

Posted

I gave up on Endomondo, after only switching to it again after everyone was raving about it on here, due to the perceived inaccuracies on my Nokia N8. And it is not the GPS chip as that phone has a great one. Parts of the trail were being cut off and when transferring online it would lose some of the data and not allow a reupload. Sportstracker follows my trails with pretty decent accuracy, obviously as with any GPS some tight corners may be missed but nothing major like Endomondo.

 

Well, I think it's a given. If you have a Nokia, sportstracker is the way to go.

Posted

Make sure you lock your phone when you put it back in your bag ,pocket .A bump switches it off .I was considering a bryton gps but now i only use my bb and endomondo and cateye 80 .I realy dont care to know my heartrate.If you push yourself regularly you will know your body.s limits

Posted

Make sure you lock your phone when you put it back in your bag ,pocket .A bump switches it off .I was considering a bryton gps but now i only use my bb and endomondo and cateye 80 .I realy dont care to know my heartrate.If you push yourself regularly you will know your body.s limits

 

Are BBs not compatible with the HRM? On other makes you can use a bluetooth Polar HRM with the Endomondo app. Works great!

Posted

i tried endomondo once, but found cardiotrainer better. nothing beats a garmin/bryton though and since going that route i dont bother with the phone based solutions

Posted (edited)

i tried endomondo once, but found cardiotrainer better. nothing beats a garmin/bryton though and since going that route i dont bother with the phone based solutions

 

I always find these arguments in favour of stand alone devices interesting. It often comes up when discussing a camera on a phone. The point is that I prefer to have my phone with me when I cycle in case of an emergency. I also like the idea of being able to snap a picture if something interests me along the way. Then, of course, I want to be able to track my route, check my speeds, elevation gain, and heart rate. So why carry three seperate devices when I can slip one in my pocket that does it all? And if the truth be known, my choice of phone does all three excellently.

 

Please note I do understand you are expressing your opinion. So am I :)

Edited by Clint_ZA
Posted

I always find these arguments in favour of stand alone devices interesting. It often comes up when discussing a camera on a phone. The point is that I prefer to have my phone with me when I cycle in case of an emergency. I also like the idea of being able to snap a picture if something interests me along the way. Then, of course, I want to be able to track my route, check my speeds, elevation gain, and heart rate. So why carry three seperate devices when I can slip one in my pocket that does it all? And if the truth be known, my choice of phone does all three excellently.

 

Please note I do understand you are expressing your opinion. So am I :)

Hear what you say, my reluctance is purely as i don't want to wipe out and break my phone! Although now I dont take a phone with me which is a bit stupid (note to self: buy a cheap phone). I used carbo-trainer the whole of last year and it worked fine (battery life, recording etc) So therefore the reason went for a device was ruggidness, access to information while riding, integrated HRM) the 35hr battery life also helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout