Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just some feedback from my side. After using the powerbeam last few weeks I have made some notes on the powercal readings compared to the powerbeam in certain hr ranges.

 

From what I can see so far is that the higher the intensity of your ride the more accurate the avg reading of the powercal is. Anything from 130bpm avg and lower the watts seem to be out by sometimes up to 15%. For rides higher than a 140bpm avg the accuracy seems to be from about 7% to sometimes as close as 0.5%. The higher the avg hr the more accurate the avg watt. The powercal always gives lower avg watt readings

 

Do any of you notice something simular?

Edited by Jaco-fiets
  • Replies 257
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout