Patchelicious Posted May 11, 2016 Share All of the latest research shows that shorter is better. Across the board, i.e. irrespective of your height. So 172.5 is better than 175. And 170 is even better. I'm 6'2" and run a 170mm crank.Would you post those links please. Could be an interesting read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongoose! Posted May 11, 2016 Share All of the latest research shows that shorter is better. Across the board, i.e. irrespective of your height. So 172.5 is better than 175. And 170 is even better. I'm 6'2" and run a 170mm crank.Naaaa, I don't believe it. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted May 11, 2016 Share All of the latest research shows that shorter is better. Across the board, i.e. irrespective of your height. .Are we still talking cranks here?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted May 11, 2016 Share Are we still talking cranks here??Hehehe ???? For MTB, a somewhat longer crank is recommended For greater 'torque' ???? I run 175 for MTB And 172.5 for road Most of the reading suggests it's a highly personal choice too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spirog Posted May 12, 2016 Share Thanks for all the input guys. Like with everything on the Hub, opinions are divided. I'm going to try the compact cranks and then I'll also have an opinion to confuse the next guy who asks the question... I guess that, like most things, it's entirely subjective and until I've trued it, I'll never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombeej Posted May 12, 2016 Share It's my lightys graduation today. Then going out to celebrate. Will post info tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NordicElf Posted May 12, 2016 Share Thanks for all the input guys. Like with everything on the Hub, opinions are divided. I'm going to try the compact cranks and then I'll also have an opinion to confuse the next guy who asks the question... I guess that, like most things, it's entirely subjective and until I've trued it, I'll never know. Let us know how it goes, with info on what kind of cyclist you are etc. I'm very interested in this topic . And what your experience is with the shorter cranks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekpostal Posted May 12, 2016 Share 52/36 with 28/11 that you're not dropped at top end speed but climb way easier than with a 39. I have seen 52/34 once but you will need a chain catcher and a prayer when you shift down me thinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannabe Posted May 12, 2016 Share 52/36 with 28/11 that you're not dropped at top end speed but climb way easier than with a 39. I have seen 52/34 once but you will need a chain catcher and a prayer when you shift down me thinks I'm no real "elite" cyclist (more middle of the bunch) but I cannot recall ever being dropped at top end due to me spinning out, but rather that I ran out of legs. This include a good few training rides with the Durbanville Giant guys. Riding a compact 50/34 with 11-25 cassette. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.