Jump to content

Gravel Burn Bike Check: Kevin Benkenstein's Santa Cruz Stigmata


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Martin Albrecht said:

So, a 90s hardtail MTB with drop bars?Β 

Haha, yes please share the 90s hardtail mtb, with the same stiff carbon frame, disk brakes, geometry, sub 9kg build, 29er wheels?😁 Don’t forget the gear ratios and 1x setup.Β 
Β 

Spoilt for choice, we are. I would rather say😁

Edited by W@nted
Posted
16 hours ago, W@nted said:

Haha, yes please share the 90s hardtail mtb, with the same stiff carbon frame, disk brakes, geometry, sub 9kg build, 29er wheels?😁 Don’t forget the gear ratios and 1x setup.Β 
Β 

Spoilt for choice, we are. I would rather say😁

Sorry, was just poking a bit of fun. But, for the record, I will give you the carbon frame and 29er wheels, but for the rest, this isn’t actually that far off a 90s, or even 2000s MTB with drop bars:

In 2007, my MTB was a Giant of some kind, can’t recall the model now, it had a RockShox fork with I think 80mm of travel, hydrolic disk brakes, 1.9 inch (48mm) tires, geometry not too far off a modern gravel bikes, a 44 tooth chainring (with a bonus 32 and 22 thrown in for fun), and I think an 11/36 rear cassette - which one could argue gave even more range than is available on a modern gravel bike🀣 There might actually even have been a carbon version of this frame available also… I can’t remember, and if there was, it was way out of my price range back then.Β 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Martin Albrecht said:

Sorry, was just poking a bit of fun. But, for the record, I will give you the carbon frame and 29er wheels, but for the rest, this isn’t actually that far off a 90s, or even 2000s MTB with drop bars:

In 2007, my MTB was a Giant of some kind, can’t recall the model now, it had a RockShox fork with I think 80mm of travel, hydrolic disk brakes, 1.9 inch (48mm) tires, geometry not too far off a modern gravel bikes, a 44 tooth chainring (with a bonus 32 and 22 thrown in for fun), and I think an 11/36 rear cassette - which one could argue gave even more range than is available on a modern gravel bike🀣 There might actually even have been a carbon version of this frame available also… I can’t remember, and if there was, it was way out of my price range back then.Β 

No problem. I had a nice Merida hard tail 26er in the early 2010's. I would choose my current Giant Revolt over that Merida any day of the week :)Β Β 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/21/2025 at 4:44 PM, Benky said:

It came down to a few reasons. I want to ride the fork and prefer the suspension corrected frame when doing so, specifically as I have quite a low stack for my bike size. Riding the GXR4 with a Fox fork would leave me 30mm higher, so I prefer it rigid with big tyres for my own fit needs.

Similarly, while the Curve is a more comfortable bike, I do hope to be racing and feel that for these shorter days (by my standards to be fair) a slightly stiffer bottom bracket area is beneficial, even though both bikes fit similar tyre sizes. Effectively over 100-150km I feel faster on a Stig, whereas for a multi-day non-stop ride I think the titanium ride quality and its benefits overcome the slightly less efficient frame stiffness and I feel faster on that.

It is a horses for courses approach, one that I am happy to discuss so if there are any other questions let me know.

This worked well for you.
Congratulations on your race.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout