Tumbleweed Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 One wonders if Kimmage has used Jesus as much as he has pursued Armstrong in fight against doping? again, i'd point to the other reason (ie, not cancer) for coming back: to prove he can and does race clean. he's set himself up for it.
Tumbleweed Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Aaaiiiiiiiii..... just cant win can he? he used to be quite good at winning!
Tumbleweed Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 B. Lance's attitude. Which in my mind is justifiably one of anger at the blatant double standards and outright lies of the press. He has never been found positive' date=' never been sanctioned by WADA, UCI, USADA, or even the TRC. So why the un founded and un proven allegations? As a professional athlete, malicious rumours, lies, slander have a dramatic impact on his livlihood. Of course he will take all necessary steps to protect his income.[/quote'] the blatant lies of the press? i know you never dirty your fingers with newsprint, but i think you'll find the media - cycling and mainstream - are for the most part fawning when it comes to their coverage of lance. double standards? elaborate please?
NotSoBigBen Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 'fawning'? Bloody hell do I have to get jagwil here to help me or what!
Tumbleweed Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 'fawning'? Bloody hell do I have to get jagwil here to help me or what! Definitions of fawning on the Web:bootlicking: attempting to win favor from influential people by flattery wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now