andretraut Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 I traded my 26" FS (Merida 96 Team) for a 29er HT (S-Works Stumpy) and almost could not tell the difference in comfort. The 29er is a bit more forgiving than a 26" HT, but not yet a FS. Wayne0607 1
Iwan Kemp Posted January 5, 2012 Author Posted January 5, 2012 love my fisher dual sus...very comfy  29"?
ibruegge Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 I got rid off my Felt 29" Nine Elite Carbon HT after last year and got a Scott Spark Elite 29" FS - and what a difference it does to ride comfort! The story about "29er HT is almost like a soft tail" - it is just a story.
Witkop Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 cost difference? weight difference? we would all like to drive a rolls royce and sleep with (add desireable person's name here) but we cannot.
Duathlete007 Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 You must take into account that dual suspension alloy frames are heavy. For example a Merida 96 alloy frame with carbon rear stays weighs 3kg! That is heavy for a dual suspension frame. I would say if weight is taken into concsideration i would've bought a carbon dual suspension. But personally carbon hard tail 29ers are the thing for me. You must know if you are going to use the travel on a dual suspension fully to actually buy one.
Iwan Kemp Posted January 5, 2012 Author Posted January 5, 2012 For example a Merida 96 alloy frame with carbon rear stays weighs 3kg! Sure?
Iwan Kemp Posted January 5, 2012 Author Posted January 5, 2012 (edited) Wow! That's rough. That's more than most trail bikes and A LOT more than an Anthem frame at 2.3kg incl shock. Also means their Alu frame is 1kg heavier than their carbon! The Zula is 2450g. Edited January 5, 2012 by The Crow
Duathlete007 Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 That is why i am going to the Merida carbon big nine 3000D
Iwan Kemp Posted January 5, 2012 Author Posted January 5, 2012 Still find it hard to believe. A Giant Reign X with shock and hardware, and this is a 160mm bike, weighs 3.1kg!
ibruegge Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 Wow! That's rough. That's more than most trail bikes and A LOT more than an Anthem frame at 2.3kg incl shock. Also means their Alu frame is 1kg heavier than their carbon! The Zula is 2450g. I picked up 2 kilograms over Christmas. Bike still the same.
Monark Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 I honestly have NO idea how people can say that a 29HT is the same or similar to a 26FS.... what 26 FS were you riding??? My 26FS is a Giant Anthem, it is plush and I use all 100mm of travel. My 29HT is a Merida, it is much harder than the Giant. Do not be fooled, it is still a hard tail and will still have hardtail characteristics.
Wayne Potgieter Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 I picked up 2 kilograms over Christmas. Bike still the same.
Iwan Kemp Posted January 26, 2012 Author Posted January 26, 2012 Do not be fooled, it is still a hard tail and will still have hardtail characteristics. +1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now