Jump to content

ClydeB1

Members
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ClydeB1

  1. VF for me again, 5:53 start so plenty of time for a second lap . Going to be interesting to see how the tactics unfold on the reverse route.
  2. They did have them for sale at registration last year
  3. Also doing the Ride, 2nd time and starting in C batch. Can’t wait.....
  4. TSS: 558 IF: 0.72 7 sessions including a VERY short and VERY chilled MTB coffee ride yesterday.
  5. TSS - 689 IF - 0.75 6 rides (5 IDT sessions and 1 Club coffee ride)
  6. Was in first main bunch of AL (excluding the few who got away as usual up Hill Snacks) until my mate punctured his tubbie on the way up to Maropeng. As this was more of a training ride for me, I turned around and went back to help him. Rejoined the 3rd AL bunch which had been caught by the few front runners from BL and ended finishing in 3:11. With the ride to the start and back home got in some good solid TITS for L'etape.....
  7. AL but going to use this as a long training ride for L'etape by riding to and back from the race
  8. Nada. Guess we'll find out our seeding when we collect the numbers.
  9. I'm no expert but I would think that TSB is probably the more appropriate figure to target before a race. The higher the CTL, the better BUT only if you are sufficiently rested. So it's a balancing act to try to keep CTL as high as you can whilst at the same time reducing ATL (which will unfortunately at the same time result in a slight drop off in CTL) but resulting in either a positive (or low negative) TSB score. For example it wouldn't help having a CTL of 75 with an ATL of 100 (i.e. TSB of -25) and you'd probably be better off with a CTL of 70 and ATL of 60 (TSB = +10)
  10. Put the IF score in there to see who was paying attention lol....
  11. Yip, FTP test planned for later this week. Haven't done one in a while...... Did get notified of new threshold value after race and hoping to see a nice jump.
  12. Started A bunch and lost the front of the group before I even got a chance to cross the start line Due to some of the challenges with the start loading as have been discussed. I've got a bit more of a "diesel engine" so don't really do that well trying to close gaps from middle of the bunch from the get go. Seemed like there were already 3 groups by the time we hit Summit. Official Time: 2:42:14 (Target was sub 2:40, 2015: 2:52:55, 2014: 3:29:13) Max speed: 83.4 Avg HR: 142 Max HR: 163 (54 yrs) Avg power: 244 (3.18) Max power: 1245 (16.23) NP: 303 (3.95) 20 minute power: 292 (3.81) TSS : 326.9 IF: 1.1 Avg cadence: 86 Race day weight: 76.7
  13. As you mention they are both flat and fast and similar routes and profiles etc. Will largely depend on the weather/wind on the day. As an example I did Emperors in 2:20 and Carnival in 2:30 both in VC this year but the last bit was into quite a strong headwind at Carnival if memory serves me
  14. ClydeB1

    The I-Team

    Thanks, I used your calculator to set a 2:55:00 target, but only memorized a few of the key points like M1, Wilds, Witkoppen etc and was also initially behind, then went ahead and managed to hold on to most of the gains and it would seem pretty darn realistic. Thanks again. Some more data points for you if they help with your model. I also started in D and started my Garmin with the gun.3.8 km 0:10:26 9.7 km 0:21:10 13.2 km 0:25:55 19.4 km 0:34:54 24.2 km 0:45:12 36.9 km 1:07:10 39.2 km 1:15:21 47.3 km 1:28:31 52 km 1:35:41 56.7 km 1:43:01 60.4 km 1:48:22 69.9 km 2:03:37 (got passed by your GW train, should have hooked on) 74.8 km 2:14:27 80.1 km 2:25:35 83.4 km 2:30:06 87.2 km 2:37:25 91.2 km 2:47:07 Finish 2:52:50 (93.4 km, official time 2:52:55) For the 947 20km to go Strava segment I rode 0:40:04 (up from 48:59 last year where I rode a 3:29)
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout