Vetseun Posted February 21, 2014 Share Ton is up for AB from202 balls.JPD is at 53.SA 315 for 5.Looking Good,Hopefully bat ourselves into a position whereby we can t lose the match.Then have a good go at the Aussies.Pressure is essential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Winter Posted February 21, 2014 Share Looking Good,Hopefully bat ourselves into a position whereby we can t lose the match.Then have a good go at the Aussies.Pressure is essential I'd like us to declare 15 overs before the end of play today. With close to 500 on the board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mon-goose Posted February 21, 2014 Share nice to JP getting in some runs again. Will do his confidence well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannabe Posted February 21, 2014 Share JP @ 93. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Winter Posted February 21, 2014 Share JP @100. Corrected Wannabe and GLuvsMtb 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLuvsMtb Posted February 21, 2014 Share Corrected Well played JP! Wannabe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Winter Posted February 21, 2014 Share Parnel you beauty!! 3 balls 2 whickets GLuvsMtb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLuvsMtb Posted February 21, 2014 Share Parnel you beauty!! 3 balls 2 whickets He seems to be getting some movement in the air. Pray the light holds for another 30 minutes or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joeboy69 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Spinners did well for Aus, what are the chances of QdK keeping while AB sends down a few slow overs? He can do a "Dean Hall" but I think Boucher also did both in the Windies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLuvsMtb Posted February 21, 2014 Share Spinners did well for Aus, what are the chances of QdK keeping while AB sends down a few slow overs? He can do a "Dean Hall" but I think Boucher also did both in the WindiesDuminy, Elgar and Faf will probably get a go before AB does. Lets hope that we dont need that second new ball tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLuvsMtb Posted February 21, 2014 Share Howler from the umpire and smith does not review!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christie Posted February 21, 2014 Share Great bowling by SA. I love the aggression from Morkel, where was that last week? Too bad AB dropped Warner. I also wonder why Smith did not review that edge from Lyon -perhaps concerned about wasting a review on a tail-ender? Im glad we did not roll over and play dead like England did when Aus put them under pressure. We can hit them hard tomorrow, we need to get Warner, Haden and Smith. If we bat again, I hope some of our batsmen who threw their wickets away can focus a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christie Posted February 21, 2014 Share Spinners did well for Aus, what are the chances of QdK keeping while AB sends down a few slow overs? He can do a "Dean Hall" but I think Boucher also did both in the WindiesI think you are only allowed to switch keepers once per innings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cellar Posted February 21, 2014 Share I think you are only allowed to switch keepers once per innings. Maybe Qdk is a better test wicket keeper than he is batsman? Put AB as batsman and part time spinner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joeboy69 Posted February 21, 2014 Share I think you are only allowed to switch keepers once per innings. Interesting, never even thought there was a rule like that! Eng had Aus in similar trouble, but then Haddin and the tail would put on plenty runs, so need to wrap this up not long after lunch, especially at the rate they are scoring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLuvsMtb Posted February 21, 2014 Share I think you are only allowed to switch keepers once per innings.Its not covered under Rule 2 (substitutions) or rule 40 (wicket keeping). Under what rule does this fall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.7c5df35e0b0702fd0a188fbc168fd197.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now