'Dale Posted November 17, 2016 Share Very interestingFor the stat geeks amongst us http://p.imgci.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/255100/255145.png GLuvsMtb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Readsalot Posted November 18, 2016 Share So, three years ago Faf didn't contest the charge of ball tampering, but this time he has pleaded not guilty. Du Plessis has pleaded not guilty and the ICC is yet to confirm when he will appear before match referee Andy Pycroft to plead his case.ICC chief executive David Richardson laid the charge on Friday, alleging du Plessis had breached the rules by changing the condition of the ball in the second Test against Australia in Hobart.South Africa ripped through Australia’s batting in both innings, dismissing them for 85 and 161.“The alleged incident happened on Tuesday morning when TV footage appeared to show du Plessis applying saliva and residue from a mint or sweet – an artificial substance – to the ball in an attempt to change its condition,” the ICC said in a statement.“All level two breaches carry an imposition of a fine between 50% to 100% of the applicable match fee and/or up to two suspension points, and three or four demerit points.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 18, 2016 Share 72/3 England chasing the mammoth Indian total Spin fest ???????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 18, 2016 Share Ashwin spin magician ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 18, 2016 Share India 455England trail by 380 odd7 wickets in hand Tough times for Eng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 18, 2016 Share WICKET ⚠️ Eng in troubles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 18, 2016 Share Root with a respectable 53 OUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 18, 2016 Share 60 balls left in the day Eng 87/5 ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeubok Posted November 18, 2016 Share So, three years ago Faf didn't contest the charge of ball tampering, but this time he has pleaded not guilty. Du Plessis has pleaded not guilty and the ICC is yet to confirm when he will appear before match referee Andy Pycroft to plead his case.ICC chief executive David Richardson laid the charge on Friday, alleging du Plessis had breached the rules by changing the condition of the ball in the second Test against Australia in Hobart.South Africa ripped through Australia’s batting in both innings, dismissing them for 85 and 161.“The alleged incident happened on Tuesday morning when TV footage appeared to show du Plessis applying saliva and residue from a mint or sweet – an artificial substance – to the ball in an attempt to change its condition,” the ICC said in a statement.“All level two breaches carry an imposition of a fine between 50% to 100% of the applicable match fee and/or up to two suspension points, and three or four demerit points.”Ok so in defense of Faf. 9/10 players chew gum whilst on the field (which really annoys me). So if you're chewing gum are you not allowed to "work" the ball? That's probably what he's going to argue, he just happened to be chewing gum and wasn't intentionally rubbing gum on the ball. BUT the video footage does not help his case. The way he works his finger in and out with the gum stuck on his tongue does not look good.. The fact that he's been guilty of ball tampering before won't help either. Will be flippen interesting to see the outcome of this investigation! Readsalot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 19, 2016 Share India vs Eng So England get through to lunch with just one wicket lost, but considering the match situation the fact that they lost one wicket makes it India's session. This pitch will offer more turn in the second session, and India will also have a new ball at their disposal. Despite such good batting from Stokes and Bairstow, India still have 264 in bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 19, 2016 Share Flurry of boundaries Stokes's bat looks like a barn door And he's out ???? Edited November 19, 2016 by 'Dale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 19, 2016 Share 255/8200 runs behind Indian spinners using the new ball - only in Asia ⚠️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 19, 2016 Share 255 all out200 behind England inniekak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted November 19, 2016 Share 2 wickets, 2 balls Ashwin the Grim Reaper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubehunter Posted November 19, 2016 Share 2 wickets, 2 ballsAshwin the Grim Reaper You called? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertusras Posted November 19, 2016 Share Ok so in defense of Faf. 9/10 players chew gum whilst on the field (which really annoys me). So if you're chewing gum are you not allowed to "work" the ball? That's probably what he's going to argue, he just happened to be chewing gum and wasn't intentionally rubbing gum on the ball. BUT the video footage does not help his case. The way he works his finger in and out with the gum stuck on his tongue does not look good.. The fact that he's been guilty of ball tampering before won't help either. Will be flippen interesting to see the outcome of this investigation! Exactly your last part. I also believe that this all is horse manure, but the manner in which he did it, and his past offences. Stupid. Ban him for 5 games for being an idiot. GLuvsMtb and mtbride 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now