Jump to content

SS Conversion


LukeV-2

Recommended Posts

Same applies as per the 3 ring crank where you might need the spacers or shortened bolts

Also depends on whether or not you want to get a new chainring at some point. Most (not all) MTB chainrings have a BCD (bolt centre diameter) of 104mm. I know that some 2x10 cranks differ from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Same applies as per the 3 ring crank where you might need the spacers or shortened bolts

 

So....

I can use the outer ring, put on a suitable tooth ring and then just line it up with the rear cog?

Sounds excellent then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So....

I can use the outer ring, put on a suitable tooth ring and then just line it up with the rear cog?

Sounds excellent then!

 

In principle yes. In practice, tell us after the weekend!

 

I am pretty sure though that it would work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also depends on whether or not you want to get a new chainring at some point. Most (not all) MTB chainrings have a BCD (bolt centre diameter) of 104mm. I know that some 2x10 cranks differ from that.

Yes, the 2x10 have a different BCD ..... I think it limits my options extensively.

 

Research shows the BCD is 120mm on the outer (big) ring

Edited by Ross Winckworth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So....

I can use the outer ring, put on a suitable tooth ring and then just line it up with the rear cog?

Sounds excellent then!

 

Don't forget the chain tensioner and spacers

Edited by Hairy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a 2x crank, pick the inner or outer chainring position that will give the best chainline. Anything between 31 and 39 tooth chainrings will work, depending on your rear cog selection. Most guys on a 26'er run 32x16 and on a 29'er run a 32x20.

 

I run a 38 x 20 on my 26'er

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's a case of each to their own but do you think it's a feasible idea to stick with the 39t in front and use a higher toothed cog in the rear, like a 22 etc. Depending on the tooth options available? Don't really want to have to shell some Rand on a new chain ring when I could make do with what I have already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The higher the tooth count, the more chain-wrap you have and less chance of dropping the chain - even if it's at a slight weight penalty

 

Use what u got and save for what you want.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can post me one when fruity makes his order ... hell let me know we can drink it together ... well kind of a JHB/CT drink thing. But you get the idea

 

Order Placed.. :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

That last picture of a tensioner looks like a dual suspension single speed. Has any body tried this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout