Jump to content

26/27.5/29 Mega Merge Thread.


Tieffels

Recommended Posts

Okay, I'll bite...

 

I want a 26er as a hardtail because I use it as my all mountain machine. It has a 150mm fork on the front, and big ass burly tires front and back coupled with wheels that can tale a pounding from my weit and any obstacles that I don't miss. I also use it to practice jumping and so on. I would not do that on a 29er ht. no way in hell. Can you imagine the geo on a 29er hardtail with 150mm up front?

 

Pus, it's more lively on the 6er, i have a better choice of strong wheels and burly forks, and I have far more fun on it than I would on a 29er ht. tried, tested. No likey.

 

Yes, for boring jeeptrack and dirt roadie style riding, I would get a niner ht. but then again, I wouldn't, because I'd rather get a long travel 29er full susser.

 

Your comment is redundant, Berg Bok.

 

Hahah I also have a 29er dual susser, my 29er hardtail is my race bike to fly up those hills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 452
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

Even better, 26 front and 29 back. Then you have comfort on a cheaper HT frame but still have the sharp turning in front ;)

And then I would always be riding downhill so I would be faster ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Scott Blurb:

 

"Larger wheels cary momentum better than smaller wheels. This means you continue to roll through technical sections without being hung up on objects and slowed down."

 

Or as Brian Lopes would say: Learn to bunny hop!

 

Or learn to continiously bunny hop 5 times per second when riding off-road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I'll bite...

 

Pus, it's more lively on the 6er, i have a better choice of strong wheels and burly forks, and I have far more fun on it than I would on a 29er ht. tried, tested. No likey.

 

 

I agree with your views, but it's uncalled for to use that Jac Parrow language to get your message across. :D ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then I would always be riding downhill so I would be faster ;)

I commented on that idea a while back .Seems it is gaining momentum.650b front 29 back makes perfect sense to me .Now to find a frame Edited by Blitzer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I commented on that idea a while back .Seems it is gaining momentum.650b front 29 back makes perfect sense to me .Now to find a frame

 

DO I detect a hint of sarcasm there?

 

If not - dumbest idea ever. The front of the bike is where you want the rolling ability & obstacle munching wheel. Exactly the reason that Trek brought the 69er to market. Bump compliance at front, normal size at the back. Also exactly why MX bikes have bigger front wheels than back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just learn to bunny hop further than half a metre!

 

Yep, which he proved when started racing CX and cleared most obstacles they threw at him.

 

I know Lopes' book back to front. On 29ers:

"I hear they roll through stuff better, but I have never had a problem rolling through anything".

 

99.99% of the time I'm faster descending on a long travel 26er and through very rough technical sections but on choppy fast descents a 29er will pick up speed and roll faster though. Still I'd rather be faster dh most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

DO I detect a hint of sarcasm there?

 

If not - dumbest idea ever. The front of the bike is where you want the rolling ability & obstacle munching wheel. Exactly the reason that Trek brought the 69er to market. Bump compliance at front, normal size at the back. Also exactly why MX bikes have bigger front wheels than back.

That's why I thought I should try a 650b or 29er rim with my lefty and keep 26 on the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

DO I detect a hint of sarcasm there?

 

If not - dumbest idea ever. The front of the bike is where you want the rolling ability & obstacle munching wheel. Exactly the reason that Trek brought the 69er to market. Bump compliance at front, normal size at the back. Also exactly why MX bikes have bigger front wheels than back.

That's why I thought I should try a 650b or 29er rim with my lefty and keep 26 on the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Fixed. Got both of them at home...

 

Nice. :thumbup:

 

The biggest problem I have with 29ers is confidence in the strength of the wheels. I'm a large guy and like riding my bikes hard. Even when I was road racing I was an equipment breaker. I have broken a few sets of 26" wheels. That's why I have DH wheels on my trail bike which I ride everywhere. Just in case I accidentally hit that 5 foot drop again. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. :thumbup:

 

The biggest problem I have with 29ers is confidence in the strength of the wheels. I'm a large guy and like riding my bikes hard. Even when I was road racing I was an equipment breaker. I have broken a few sets of 26" wheels. That's why I have DH wheels on my trail bike which I ride everywhere. Just in case I accidentally hit that 5 foot drop again. :D

 

Same same, dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout