Jump to content

Lance Armstrong must pay $10m in damages after losing a lawsuit


SwissVan

Recommended Posts

Posted

I cannot believe that no trolls have pounced on this, maybe its true that no one cares anymore....

 

TBH I think its a bit unfair

 

Lance Armstrong must pay $10m (£6.51m) in damages after losing a lawsuit with insurance firm SCA Promotions Inc.

 

http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/cycling/31495246

 

"Armstrong admitted to doping and was found to have lied in proceedings.

SCA said: "The award, which must be paid directly to SCA, is believed to be the largest award of sanctions assessed against an individual in American judicial history."

SCA initially refused to pay out money covering the bonus for Armstrong's sixth Tour de France win in 2004.

Armstrong took the company to an arbitration hearing in Dallas in 2005 and won, because the contract between the parties stipulated the insurance money would be payable if Armstrong was the "official winner" of the Tour.

He was awarded $2.5m (£1.6m) in damages and costs.

"SCA's dispute with Armstrong is not over," said the firm.

"It has a currently pending lawsuit in Dallas state district court where it is pursuing additional claims against Lance Armstrong and Bill Stapleton (Armstrong's agent)."

In 2012, the United States Anti-Doping Agency issued Armstrong with a life ban and stripped all seven of his Tour de France titles.

The Texan was accused of being part of the "most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme" that sport had ever known.

During a 2013 television interview with American talk-show host Oprah Winfrey, Armstrong confessed that he used banned performance-enhancing drugs throughout much of his cycling career.

Last month, the Texan told the BBC , when asked if he would make the same choice to cheat that he made in 1995: "When I made the decision, when my team made that decision, when the whole peloton made that decision, it was a bad decision and an imperfect time.

"But it happened. And I know what happened because of that. I know what happened to the sport, I saw its growth."

SCA Promotions president and founder Bob Hamman said: "It is hard to describe how much harm Lance Armstrong's web of lies caused SCA but this is a good first start towards repairing that damage."

Jeff Tillotson, SCA's promotions lawyer added: "This record-breaking award was justified given Armstrong's outrageous conduct."

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I cannot believe that no trolls have pounced on this, maybe its true that no one cares anymore....

 

TBH I think its a bit unfair

 

Lance Armstrong must pay $10m (£6.51m) in damages after losing a lawsuit with insurance firm SCA Promotions Inc.

 

http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/cycling/31495246

 

"Armstrong admitted to doping and was found to have lied in proceedings.

SCA said: "The award, which must be paid directly to SCA, is believed to be the largest award of sanctions assessed against an individual in American judicial history."

SCA initially refused to pay out money covering the bonus for Armstrong's sixth Tour de France win in 2004.

Armstrong took the company to an arbitration hearing in Dallas in 2005 and won, because the contract between the parties stipulated the insurance money would be payable if Armstrong was the "official winner" of the Tour.

He was awarded $2.5m (£1.6m) in damages and costs.

"SCA's dispute with Armstrong is not over," said the firm.

"It has a currently pending lawsuit in Dallas state district court where it is pursuing additional claims against Lance Armstrong and Bill Stapleton (Armstrong's agent)."

In 2012, the United States Anti-Doping Agency issued Armstrong with a life ban and stripped all seven of his Tour de France titles.

The Texan was accused of being part of the "most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme" that sport had ever known.

During a 2013 television interview with American talk-show host Oprah Winfrey, Armstrong confessed that he used banned performance-enhancing drugs throughout much of his cycling career.

Last month, the Texan told the BBC , when asked if he would make the same choice to cheat that he made in 1995: "When I made the decision, when my team made that decision, when the whole peloton made that decision, it was a bad decision and an imperfect time.

"But it happened. And I know what happened because of that. I know what happened to the sport, I saw its growth."

SCA Promotions president and founder Bob Hamman said: "It is hard to describe how much harm Lance Armstrong's web of lies caused SCA but this is a good first start towards repairing that damage."

Jeff Tillotson, SCA's promotions lawyer added: "This record-breaking award was justified given Armstrong's outrageous conduct."

He seems to have his very own 'pay back the money' crisis happening.
Posted

a bit unfair??

 

he got paid $12m and now has to only return $10m?

so he keeps the other $2m, and interest.

 

this after he cheated, then took them to court and lied in a court about cheating.

ja, very unfair.

Posted

Seeing that he lost this case.. I reckon other sponsors that were generous back then will start with their cases against him.. if they haven't already. . He is gonna need more booze to cope with that..

 

Come on Lance.. pay back the money.

Posted

Seeing that he lost this case.. I reckon other sponsors that were generous back then will start with their cases against him.. if they haven't already. . He is gonna need more booze to cope with that..

 

Come on Lance.. pay back the money.

 

That's okay...his girlfriend will drive...

Posted

I think they should start making the calculations on the amount earned in tv rights, Oakley, giro, trek and numerous others during the time he made them famous. Take that money and give it to some charity. Many capitalized off him performance/fame lets not forget that. If he needs to start coughing up the others should do too

Posted

a bit unfair??

 

he got paid $12m and now has to only return $10m?

so he keeps the other $2m, and interest.

 

this after he cheated, then took them to court and lied in a court about cheating.

ja, very unfair.

 

Unfair in the sense that most other dopers don't pay back the money they got while doping

Posted

People could start by auctioning their Livestrong wristbands? 

 

can you believe but I never ever had one.... but I got few books which apparently are worthless at the moment

Posted

Thanks (sarcasm drip) moderators for changing the topic heading and moving it from Rant and rave.

Do you realize the importance of the "troll" word in LA discussions? I think not :cursing:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout