Jump to content

MTB race seeding!


Santa C

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No WW they were supposed to use everybody's results from Mabalingwe. I checked his index on mtncycling.co.za before Mabalingwe was added, but after Mabalingwe, where he came 6th in the 35 km, his index didnt change at all. After some queying to and fro, his index was adjusted this morning and he will now start in batch B. He doesnt have a new numberboard yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think the SAS (myn cycling board) cost about R30

Where can I purchase one of these boards?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the SAS (myn cycling board) cost about R30

Where can I purchase one of these boards?

 

I think @ FPC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Swift01, sorry to say this but ROAG is not much better, it only pays to ride all the ROAG races to get a good seeding!!

If you do 1 or 2 races and do very well in them, they still seed you in a low batch, due to the fact you have not done enough races in KZN

 

I did Karkloof and Greytown last year, both finished in the top 20...Went back to do Karkloof this year and was seeded in C batch, so that meant havin 120 riders in front of me!

Same issues as other timing co's!!<img src="https://assets.bikehub.co.za/legacy_images/smilies/smiley7.gif" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="Angry" />

<img src="https://assets.bikehub.co.za/legacy_images/smilies/smiley7.gif" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="Angry" />

 

Just seen this thread now. but if you were seeded then you were likely seeded in the correct spot according to your ranking. You only need one result to get a correct ranking, and the ranking uses the top 3 of your results. The only thing I could imagine that may have affected your ranking is that after a year a result gets weighted. Karkloof this year was just over a year after the previous one, so your result last year would have been weighted and this may have affected it. The weighting has since been changed to 18 months. At the end of the day there will always be outliers when it comes to rankings etc, but i think on the whole its about right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout