Wow, things seem to have gone a little off course here. As stated before, I have no personal vendetta against USN or any other supplement company. USN did however catch my attention. Their CEO is very vocal on Twitter, promoting new products at every opportunity. My problem came when I noticed that many of his posts were blatant lies! One that sticks in my mind is about a specific supplement being able to provide 40% (!) gains in strength or recovery or something. I went straight away and did a scientific literature search to see if there was any research at all to back these claims. Unsurprisingly, there was absolutely nothing of the sort to be found anywhere. How can it be legal for a company to make completely exaggerated claims such as this without having to provide any evidence to back themselves up? So, I sent them an e-mail. My mail was redirected to Irma Botha who is involved in R and D for USN. I asked some simple questions about whether I could see any research that had been done on some products. Irma got back to me a little while later and told me that USN does not conduct any clinical research. They relied on research done by others but they could not send me this research as it was stored in an "archive". She told me to go on to Medline and do a search. I left it at that. When I saw the kids product all I did was ask questions again but this time on Twitter. Then I was bullied and did what Albe probably didn't expect, I fought back. He seems to me like the sort of guy who is used to people running away from him, tails between their legs. I certainly didn't expect the message to spread like it did. Mr Powell, I do not profit from drug companies. I earn my money on consultation fees and don't dispense so much as an Aspirin. I have a distrust of big pharma and I am well aware of some of their dodgy practices. They are however, a strictly regulated industry. A drug has to be proven to be both safe and effective (at great cost to the company) before it is allowed to be marketed. That marketing is then strictly regulated too so that they can't even mention the specific product name in their adverts. Supplements are different, they have to be proven to be dangerous before they are removed from the market and they can be marketed as wonder-drugs without proof. You are not effectively defending USN, but rather trying to defer the blame. The supplements industry is rotten, how can you deny that? Dangle, you have an affiliation to USN. I don't think that you can comment here in an unbiased manner. And no, the odd protein shake for your 8 year old is certainly not going to kill him. I never said it would though. My mission has already been accomplished. There are now a few more people out there who will look a little more critically at the contents of a supplement before buying it. Hey, there may even be a few who will look at the available clinical research before believing an impressive sounding claim from a supplement company.