Jump to content

Cricket......


E1A104

Recommended Posts

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/72200/72222.jpg

oh crap

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/11800/11826.jpg

oh crap crap crap

 

 

 

40th Match: South Africa v Sri Lanka at Durban - Mar 3, 2003

Sri Lanka 268/9 (50/50 ov); South Africa 229/6 (45/45 ov, target: 230)

Match tied (D/L method)

Scorecard | Commentary | Article index (4) | Photo index (27)

Second world cup in a row where team PROTEAS get sent home in a tie. Except this was probably a bit more embarrassing than shocking – they were already home. Suppose we’ll never quite see cricket being a summer sport not being affected by rain in some point here.

They did the previously unthinkable – and dropped AD. He’d been going for 5.35 an over, had only taken a single wicket for a silly average of 133. And just like Jonty, his final of 164 ODIs ended in a whimper the previous game.

 

Sri Lanka won the toss and we’d have been happy with them at 90/3 after 22 overs. A 4th wicket stand of 150 came at 7rpo. A double strike got rid of both MotM Attapatu and De Silva round ther 45 over mark. But the damage was done even though only 24 came of the final 5 overs.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/DB/032003/042906.jpg

attapatu on his way to 133. pollie bowling i think, bouch standing up

 

We started pretty well, going at a run a ball until Smith first fell at 65. We were still ahead of the required run rate when Herschelle went out at 150/4. With hindsight we can ask again WTF Pollie and coach Eric Simons were thinking with the batting order. Boeta Dippenaar was never going to set any stage alight, 8 off 15 kind of his usual return. Pollie came in before Klusener, the career records will probably show that Klusener’s ODI average of 41 comfortably ahead of Pollies 24. That’s just in case you’d been lost in a forest and missed the 1999 world cup. Andrew Hall didn’t even bat.

 

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/177600/177613.jpg

we need how many?

 

This was the one time Zulu failed, his 1 off 8 probably what didn’t get us over the line. But it’s all remembered for what ended up being the final ball.

 

Moment 
Lance Klusener's arrival at the crease coincided with a deterioration in the weather. As he patted just one run from his first eight balls it became increasingly clear that the match was going to end early. At the end of the 44th over the South African dressing room sent a message to Boucher that the score needed to be 229 by the end of the 45th, assuming no further wickets fell.

The contest was on a knife edge but Sri Lanka's spinners were struggling to grip the slippery ball. Boucher pounced on the penultimate ball of the over, swinging a six over wide mid-on, and, the score now 229, he punched the air in jubilation and safely defended the last ball of the over. As he'd anticipated, the umpires pulled the players off.

However, Boucher's elation was soon replaced by confusion and then despair: the instructions had been wrong. Two hundred and twenty nine were needed for a tie. South Africa needed a win to go through. As the rain drenched the ground and play was called off, the South Africa dressing room plunged into depression.

 

Oh well, and that was that. We were out of our own tournament before the super sixes even started. Even worse, the other two co-hosts Zim and Kenya both got through (Kenya even made it to the semis). It was the second of three times super 6/8s were used in the tournament and they all ended with controversy.

Can we really feel hard done by? If you play the what-if game and reverse the 3 run opening loss to WIndies (where remember we were docked an over for bowling slowly – but quicker than the windies) then we finish top of the log in group A, and carry full points through.

BUT in hindsight it was clearly not a happy dressing room, the Hansie issue never quite pushed into the past. We beat two teams, Kenya and Canada who haven’t even qualified for the current 2015 tournament – and lost to windies and NZ, with a tie to SLanka. Just not good enough.

 

more here - http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/130177.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/wisdenalmanack/content/story/155875.html

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/DB/032003/042896.jpg

stuff this, you can be captain rather

Edited by Shebeen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The cricket world cup finally came to the Caribbean, about 20years after the WIndies had finished dominating it. The clever fellows at the ICC tweaked the tournament again in a bid to get something that works.This time they did away with the super sixes and instead created super eights. Then they loaded 4 pools of 4 teams and seeded it so the 8 main test playing nations would walk through to a nice round robin and we could then just have a semis and finals.

That’s why it wasn’t so bad that we drew Australia in our pool, we were surely going to get the better of the dutchies and the scots and move on? Like most good ideas the ICC comes up with, it backfired spectacularly. India slipped against Bangladesh and Pakistan fell to Ireland – they were gone home quickly and robbed the tournament of massive revenue mainly with India becoming a key tv market. The other feature was bizarrely high pricing forcing a vote with your wallet approach from the locals and most games were played to almost empty stadiums – with the odd touring group of supporters getting hammered on rum featuring heavily in between overs.

 

 

7th Match, Group A: Netherlands v South Africa at Basseterre - Mar 16, 2007

South Africa 353/3 (40/40 ov); Netherlands 132/9 (40/40 ov)

South Africa won by 221 runs

Scorecard | Commentary | Report | Article index (10) | Photo index (21)

The sort of thing the ICC loves to show that the associates must go somewhere else – a mismatch. 353 looks pretty decent, but a wet field meant it was 40 overs each. 500 was probably on. AB will probably still have nightmares missing out here going for a duck as an opener

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/72900/72914.jpg

how do you get AB out?

– JK scored an unbeaten hundred at more than a run a ball. But he was overshadowed a bit in the end by bouch who got a quickfire 75* off 31 balls. Even he was denied the MotM award which went to hersh in the end, he scored less runs, used up more balls and got out. But he did get 6 sixes in an over and that’s basically all this game is remembered for. Daan van Bunge was the unlucky bowler.

Youtube preserves this world first for us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRPy9-7mRCs

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/72900/72937.jpg

gibbs didn't hold back

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/72900/72930.jpg

this will help my average.

 

PE local Ryan ten Doeschate, arguably the best ever associate player, was the only one to offer resistance of any form. Biff used 7 bowlers, but only himself for the full quota of 8. His steak and pie mystery spin even got a wicket. We couldn’t get them all out, not even with the help of three runouts. Pitch was clearly a belter. 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/72900/72959.jpg

how was ZAT??!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WI committing Hara Kiri.

 

Time for them to take the tough decision to drop Gayle.

For who?

 

WIndies are most likely going to be playing NZ/Aus if they make it through to 1/4. on paper they will get steamrolled, on current form they will get a snotklap. The only chance they've got is for one of their gamebreakers to have a massively good day.Gayle is one of those, the other one is that spinner guy who has been chilling on the beach working on his action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15th Match, Group A: Scotland v South Africa at Basseterre - Mar 20, 2007

Scotland 186/8 (50/50 ov); South Africa 188/3 (23.2/50 ov)

South Africa won by 7 wickets (with 160 balls remaining)

Scorecard | Commentary | Report | Article index (5) | Photo index (25)

Just incase you needed confirmation that Warner Park was a flat pitch this was it. We couldn’t get Scotland out, in fact only took 6 wickets with the ball – Biff bowled himself before actual allrounder Justin Kemp (our attempt to replace klusener –, the only spinner in the squad was Robin Petersen – both still playing for the cobras with careers outlasting even the younger smith).

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/73200/73285.jpg

a young AB jumping all over the place

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/73200/73267.gif

Andrew hall pick of the bowlers

 

AB and Biff got us three quarters of the way there with a century plus stand at 9 an over.

Another match good for our run rate.

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/73200/73294.jpg

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/73200/73252.gif

respects are paid to former coach Bob Woolmer's shock passing during the tournament

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

ok, some long distance predictions here:

 

*SA to play Sri Lanka in the 1/4 finals.

*SA to bowl really slowly against pakistan, AB to get fined and banned for UAE game.

ok getting closer now.

 

Still think AB is going to try and get a one match ban. imagine him missing out on a knockout game for this dumb rule.

 

reckon the 1/4 matchups will be

 

Sri Lanka   South Africa

England   India

Australia   West Indies

New Zealand   Pakistan

 

 

have assumed SA beat pakistan, and Aus beat sri lanka....

Edited by Shebeen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For who?

 

WIndies are most likely going to be playing NZ/Aus if they make it through to 1/4. on paper they will get steamrolled, on current form they will get a snotklap. The only chance they've got is for one of their gamebreakers to have a massively good day.Gayle is one of those, the other one is that spinner guy who has been chilling on the beach working on his action.

 

Apparently Narine did not go to the WC for personal reasons, did not make himself available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently Narine did not go to the WC for personal reasons, did not make himself available.

 

He was not confident in his bowling action and made himself unavailable, or that was what was said in a press release.  It is shocking that they left out two of their senior players though, lots of politics in the background?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was not confident in his bowling action and made himself unavailable, or that was what was said in a press release.  It is shocking that they left out two of their senior players though, lots of politics in the background?

um ja. in the windies...always, but narine is back playing locally so it was quite a spicey reason.

With the big three bullies, there's always politics

 

we have the world's #1 and #2 bowlers watching from home. almost like the clampdown on dodgy actions was delayed to keep them out the tournament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was not confident in his bowling action and made himself unavailable, or that was what was said in a press release.  It is shocking that they left out two of their senior players though, lots of politics in the background?

 

 

um ja. in the windies...always, but narine is back playing locally so it was quite a spicey reason.

With the big three bullies, there's always politics

 

we have the world's #1 and #2 bowlers watching from home. almost like the clampdown on dodgy actions was delayed to keep them out the tournament.

Wasn't there a problem with his bowling action? So he decided to sit it out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No upper cut available from the Windies though to drop the wobbly India to the canvass.

 

Will the NRR scenario favour SA down the line?

Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a perfect day to watch cricket. Its raining in Bloem, much needed rain, so that means no riding and luckily the cricket is good. Go Proteas!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout